J
JordanWoods
Guest
I saw this on someone’s YouTube page recently …
This channel, more recently, has also taken on the task of refuting the errors of the post-Vatican II religion and showing that it is not the Catholic Church established by Jesus Christ but rather a counterfeit established by the church’s enemies in order to deceive true Catholics. We show that John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI have taught things contrary to the Catholic faith even before their elections and so it is likely that their elections were invalid and that they are not true popes but rather anti-popes. This theological position is called Sedevacantism (meaning “the seat is vacant”). Because we are of the opinion that the Holy See has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII. I do not consider Sedevacantism to be a dogma of the faith, however I believe that it is the only logical conclusion that one can come to given the evidence.
I don’t get it?
This channel, more recently, has also taken on the task of refuting the errors of the post-Vatican II religion and showing that it is not the Catholic Church established by Jesus Christ but rather a counterfeit established by the church’s enemies in order to deceive true Catholics. We show that John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI have taught things contrary to the Catholic faith even before their elections and so it is likely that their elections were invalid and that they are not true popes but rather anti-popes. This theological position is called Sedevacantism (meaning “the seat is vacant”). Because we are of the opinion that the Holy See has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII. I do not consider Sedevacantism to be a dogma of the faith, however I believe that it is the only logical conclusion that one can come to given the evidence.
I don’t get it?