B
BVMFatima
Guest
I have read an article that has claimed the Novus Ordo is invalid because of the fact that the Words of consecration are different. Here is a quote from the article which states
" Pope Pius V, De Defectibus, Part V:"The words of Consecration, which are the form of the Sacrament, are these:'THIS IS THE CHALICE OF MY BLOOD, OF THE NEW AND ETERNAL TESTAMENT, THE MYSTERY OF FAITH, WHICH SHALL BE SHED FOR YOU ANDFOR MANYUNTO THE REMISSION OF SINS’.Now if one were toomit, or tochangeanythingin the form of the consecration of the Body and Blood, and in that very change of the words the wording would fail to mean the same,he wouldnot*consecrate the Sacrament.If in fact he were to add something that did not change the meaning, it is true he would consecrate, but he would sin most gravely."
Is this true??
or is this article taking this quote out of context? Please help me understand this and may God bless you all!
Your Brother in Christ,
BVMFatima
" Pope Pius V, De Defectibus, Part V:"The words of Consecration, which are the form of the Sacrament, are these:'THIS IS THE CHALICE OF MY BLOOD, OF THE NEW AND ETERNAL TESTAMENT, THE MYSTERY OF FAITH, WHICH SHALL BE SHED FOR YOU ANDFOR MANYUNTO THE REMISSION OF SINS’.Now if one were toomit, or tochangeanythingin the form of the consecration of the Body and Blood, and in that very change of the words the wording would fail to mean the same,he wouldnot*consecrate the Sacrament.If in fact he were to add something that did not change the meaning, it is true he would consecrate, but he would sin most gravely."
Is this true??
Your Brother in Christ,
BVMFatima