S
SunnySteps
Guest
Hi all,
Apparently, I’m a bit sheltered. I had never heard of the term “selective reductions” whereby women terminate SOME of her unborn children when she is carrying multiples.
I have never, and I mean this honestly, NEVER been so disturbed by an article in the mainstream media as this one:
cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/09/03/fertility.treatment.reduction/index.html?hpt=Sbin
Please take a minute to read through and please pray with me for both the child she killed and the child that was forced to be born without his God Given sibling.
I know there are some on this forum who are more apt to call themselves “Pro-Choice”… I have to ask… even those who consider themselves Pro Choice… how can this be right?
Religion aside for a moment, this is just wrong on so many levels.
Thoughts? Have you heard of this before? Is there an argument FOR selective reduction out there anywhere? I can’t fathom one…
Apparently, I’m a bit sheltered. I had never heard of the term “selective reductions” whereby women terminate SOME of her unborn children when she is carrying multiples.
I have never, and I mean this honestly, NEVER been so disturbed by an article in the mainstream media as this one:
cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/09/03/fertility.treatment.reduction/index.html?hpt=Sbin
Please take a minute to read through and please pray with me for both the child she killed and the child that was forced to be born without his God Given sibling.
I know there are some on this forum who are more apt to call themselves “Pro-Choice”… I have to ask… even those who consider themselves Pro Choice… how can this be right?
Thoughts? Have you heard of this before? Is there an argument FOR selective reduction out there anywhere? I can’t fathom one…