To shut this down properly I will quote the teachings on the Trinity as it appears on the
remnantofgod.org (** SDA **) Website.
an example of the teachings on the O.P. website:
I have been asked repeatedly as to what I believe regarding the Trinity. Is there such a thing? Am I a Trinitarian? If I were to put it in one statement, I would have to say that the Trinitarian doctrine is a Satanic invention of Rome designed to take away from the Godhead and it’s purpose in the gift of salvation. However, merely saying that is “just my opinion” isn’t it? And many of you that know me realize I never like to give my personal opinion or interpretation on anything in the Word of God. Why? Because to do so would allow scoffers the opportunity to ignore me by believing in their hearts that I am merely a man with an opinion. Therefore, I choose to give Scripture to back up what I preach. That way, they cannot say it is my opinion simply because I am not the one who wrote the Bible.
Fact is, it’s rather easy to expose the deception of the trinity. All one needs do is simply share a few passages on the subject of the Godhead itself. So why not let the Word of the Creator do that which it is designed to do anyway? First however, we need to find out just what this Trinitarian belief entails. What does it mean when someone says they believe in the “Trinity.”
Now, look at the wording found in the Nicene Creed.
Nicene Creed:
…And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not (ἤν ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν), or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence [from the Father] or that he is a creature, or **subject to change **or conversion — all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them.
The important part, the part at issue here with the SDA’s who supported and hosted this video…
…Is that they feverishly teach that Christ WAS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
…That Christ was SUBJECT TO CONVERSION.
Pull up the Nicene Cannons and read the Synodal Letter, which states:
“First of all, then, in the presence of our most religious Sovereign Constantine, investigation was made of matters concerning the impiety and transgression of Arius and his adherents; and it was unanimously decreed that he and his impious opinion should be anathematized, together with the blasphemous words and speculations in which he indulged, blaspheming the Son of God, and saying that he is from things that are not, and that before he was begotten he was not, and that there was a time when he was not, and
that the Son of God is by his free will capable of vice and virtue”
So much for the x Priest ( so they say ) that supports rank Arianism…
…The video is worthless and those who support it is all the evidence anyone needs to simply ignore it.
