Seminary bans homosexual candidates

  • Thread starter Thread starter fix
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fix

Guest
thetablet.co.uk/cgi-bin/register.cgi/citw-#Europe

New start for Austrian seminary. The St Pölten seminary, which was closed last August after it was revealed that a seminarian had been downloading child pornography on the internet and that several others had been active homosexuals, is to reopen under a new rector, Fr Anton Leichtfried, this September, Bishop Klaus Küng announced last week. The selection criteria for seminarians at St Pölten would be very strict, Bishop Küng said. Particular care would be taken to make sure that candidates for the priesthood were heterosexually and not homosexually orientated, as celibacy meant forgoing marriage and therefore presupposed a heterosexual orientation. “It is with good reason that the Church insists that a definite homosexual orientation is an impediment to ordination. Dropping this practice could undermine celibacy and bring further grave dangers with it,” he said.

In some cases it would be necessary for candidates to undergo medical examinations to see if they were both physically and mentally suitable to become priests. The Pope had only recently emphasised that those in charge of seminaries should consult “competent experts” when necessary. And although unrestricted access to the internet was “almost taken for granted” these days, he said it was necessary to use the internet responsibly, with the necessary filters installed.

In an interview with the German journal Tagespost, Bishop Küng, who is a member of Opus Dei, was asked how widespread the issue of homosexuality in seminaries was in German-speaking countries and whether there were homosexuals’ “networks as in the USA”. He replied: “That danger exists, at least in certain areas.” Asked whether it was true that bishops were divided on the subject of homosexuality, and that many thought it might be advantageous to allow homosexual men to be ordained, he said the question had come up occasionally at Austrian bishops’ conferences, but most bishops had been “very reserved” on the issue. “Experience has since confirmed that their reservation is justified,” he said.

Bishop Küng has also announced that he will reinstate Fr Udo Fischer, a parish priest suspended by his predecessor, Bishop Kurt Krenn, in 1998. Fr Fischer, a Benedictine, was “re-installed” in his parish by his abbot. Widely known in the German-speaking world, his parish was one of the few in Austria where Catholics did not leave the Church after the seminary scandal.
Christa Pongratz-Lippitt, Vienna
 
Particular care would be taken to make sure that candidates for the priesthood were heterosexually and not homosexually orientated, as celibacy meant forgoing marriage and therefore presupposed a heterosexual orientation. “It is with good reason that the Church insists that a definite homosexual orientation is an impediment to ordination. Dropping this practice could undermine celibacy and bring further grave dangers with it,” he said.
Let us hope the Americans have the same view.
 
Perhaps we’d better hope and pray. According to the posts on another thread, the US bishops haven’t even acknowledged that it’s a problem.
 
The US should follow suit. Zero tolerance of homosexuality in the seminaries is the basic place to start.
 
Kevin Walker:
The US should follow suit. Zero tolerance of homosexuality in the seminaries is the basic place to start.
Yes, but don’t expect that such would be totally effective. There’d still be a number of homosexual men who’d be able to pass scrutiny and lay low until their ordination.
 
40.png
Richardols:
Yes, but don’t expect that such would be totally effective. There’d still be a number of homosexual men who’d be able to pass scrutiny and lay low until their ordination.
Yes, I agree. Homosexual men lie. They infiltrate any all male environment (such as the U.S. Navy) and live a lie. The celibate Buddhist monestaries in Korea have had the same homosexual problem. That is why I have suggested a battery of psychological exams plus an interview with a clinical psychologist, just like the government does for a top level security clearance or a sensitive strategic post. Those pysch tests coupled with an interview are very hard, if not impossible, to beat.
 
Kevin Walker:
Yes, I agree. Homosexual men lie.
Wow, thats a bit of a broad statement, does this mean that heterosexual men tell the truth?
 
I think he means it in the sense that they will lie to protect their secret, (as in the context of this thread and this discussion) not that heterosexuals are inherintely ‘not liars’.

And I agree, the US Bishops should follow suit. And the Priests at the Parish level should be speaking out against it as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top