Serious questions requiring sophisticated answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ellzeena
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

ellzeena

Guest
I’m presently reading Fulton J. Sheen’s “Life of Christ” and am finding much trust that resonates with me. I am also finding error: error based upon the scientific knowledge at the time of the writing; error based upon his interpretation of certain things. Archbishop Sheen goes so far as to attribute “psychoses, neuroses” to a state of sin. We are presently in the year 2013. No sin inflicts such anguish; St. Augustine came up with the concept of original sin.

Site: quotes
Augustine of Hippo (354–430) taught that Adam’s sin[16] is transmitted by concupiscence, resulting in mankind becoming a massa damnata (mass of perdition, condemned crowd), with much enfeebled, though not destroyed, freedom of will.[2] When Adam sinned, human nature was thenceforth transformed…Augustine held that the effects of Adam’s sin are transmitted to his descendants not by example but by the very fact of generation from that ancestor. A wounded nature comes to the soul and body of the new person from his/her parents, who experience libido (or concupiscence)…Christian parents transmit their wounded nature to children, because they give them birth, not the “re-birth”.[22]

Augustine believed that the only definitive destinations of souls are heaven and hell. He concluded that unbaptized infants go to hell as a consequence of original sin.[25][26]"
end site

Now, what’s ridiculous about this? Absolutely everything. Where do we learn about the “sin” or failure of “Adam and Eve”? Yes, mitochondrial DNA does point to a specific female in a specific location in Africa as the “foundational mother” of humanity: so? Is Genesis to be taken literally? if so, who believes (given the vast amount of information coming at us from sophisticated equipment that is now traveling outside our planetary system) that the universe is 6,000 years old? Carbon dating alone destroys this concept. Ok, so is carbon dating a ploy of Satan? Is what we see from the 2 Voyagers, fantastic pictures of a small portion of our galaxy, and now information that presents an actual radio signal from so far into the past that scientists cannot believe it and cannot comprehend it? Is this all a lie? Why would God allow such a lie? to what purpose? to confuse, to make it impossible to know Him, or to understand right, wrong, and in between? what sort of God does that? What sort of God passes on the “sin” of the parents to the innocent baby and forces upon that innocent life suffering and horror for something s/he has NOT voluntarily committed?

WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW?

WHAT IF these rules and regulations, arrived at by supposed infallibility, by councils and college of cardinals, ARE WRONG. What if the very thing Jesus came to tell us, that OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE FROM MAN AND NOT FROM GOD, has been perverted, yet again? WHAT IF what He wants of us is as simple as what He told us: Love God with your whole heart and soul and love one another as you love yourselves? There’s nothing there about original sin. There’s nothing there about Holy Days of Obligation. There’s nothing there about purgatory or limbo. St. Augustine said the souls of unbaptized infants went to hell! Is that a God you can believe in? Well, I can’t.

So here you have it: my God I have known my entire life, since infancy (and yes I do remember being an infant). He is beyond everything else, totally loving; He is absolutely merciful; He follows every soul past physical death in pursuit of joining that soul to Himself. He condemns no one since we condemn ourselves upon meeting Him. He allows free will or the creation would have no meaning other than some narcissistic entity. I believe He is bringing all of creation - and all has consciousness (even rocks, because down to the subatomic level consciousness has been proven) - to Himself: the ultimate “mirror image” wherein all that He loves so much can enter His embrace. And then “the eyes of the blind shall open, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongues of the dumb shall sing.”

This is Jesus. I’ve met Him. He laughs, He has great joy, He has great sorrow for each creature who suffers (not just Humans); His arms are always open, He offers healing to everyone who approaches Him in faith, He turns no one away. He approaches the serious sinner, most likely many times a day; He uses us, if we let Him, to teach, to testify, to heal (yes, heal) because, through his grace, we are His arms, His feet, His lips, His voice. And He allows His most blessed Mother to stand between us and our dire enemy because she will ultimately defeat that enemy.

I go to Mass because I meet the Lord there in His flesh and blood, not because I fear the condemnation to hell imposed upon me by some human, somewhere, some time. Our love for Him does not make us “safe”, there is no “safety”. Our love for Him does not make us rich, happy, secure, healthy…we live in this world, we are subject to its vicissitudes. Our love for Him makes us His disciples, and perhaps we will be martyred in many ways, and even die physically because of it.

I question not the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ; I question the right of humanity to put limitations on God and to judge one another when there is no true understanding of the other. We don’t all follow the yellow brick road. In some of our paths, there is true horror. Horror beyond belief. Let us remember that.
 
WHAT IF these rules and regulations, arrived at by supposed infallibility, by councils and college of cardinals, ARE WRONG. What if the very thing Jesus came to tell us, that OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE FROM MAN AND NOT FROM GOD, has been perverted, yet again? WHAT IF what He wants of us is as simple as what He told us: Love God with your whole heart and soul and love one another as you love yourselves? There’s nothing there about original sin. There’s nothing there about Holy Days of Obligation. There’s nothing there about purgatory or limbo. St. Augustine said the souls of unbaptized infants went to hell! Is that a God you can believe in? Well, I can’t.
Hi ellzeena,

You can certainly disagree with Fulton Sheen, and even St. Augustine for that matter. Things become more hazardous though when you begin discounting the teachings of the Church, and really the teachings of most of Christianity for that matter. And when I use the term “hazardous,” I’m not referring to the moral state of your soul or anything like that. I mean that it is intellectually hazardous.

I’m not sure how you’ve come to know that loving God and neighbor is all that is required of us. It sums up the law and the prophets, but if you are referring to Scripture then there is quite a bit more there; faith and hope being right at the top. Loving God really isn’t possible while disobeying His commandments, which is another issue. Regardless of how far we progress in the specialized sciences, it doesn’t impact these other truths that you seem to be discounting.

I perceive that you are troubled by original sin and the hope of salvation for infants. Yet the Catholic Church hasn’t made any definitive pronouncement on that matter. You are free to believe that God provides grace to those who do not reach the age of reason sufficient to justify.

I would recommend that you seek some spiritual direction from a priest. Hey, the worst thing that can happen is that you disagree. 🙂
 
It would be very difficult to make a “sophisticated” answer to your post, because you raise so many points. Forum policy is to have one topic per thread (so you can open multiple threads; CAF is having a summer special - all threads are FREE). This is to prevent threads from becoming a quagmire (though it still happens).

I will make a few observations.

The Church does not teach that the universe is 6,000 years old.

The Church does not teach that the creation story (or stories, as there are two) are literally true. However, if you believe in evolution, as you point out, you must admit that our species had a “Last Common Ancestor” (LCA), a distinct breeding pair from which all homo sapiens arose (they might as well be called Adam and Eve). This is an interesting situation in which a Catholic may reject the literal reading of the Bible, but a scientist must accept it.

The Church has never taught Limbo as a matter of dogma. As the current Catechism says, we have no idea what happens to unbaptized babies, and entrust them to the mercy of God.

What you are really questioning, when you get to the heart of the matter, is whether Jesus entrusted the Church with divine authority. If he did not do that, some of your complaints are valid. But I say he did that. Maybe that should be the focused topic of your next thread.

Cheers!
 
WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW?

WHAT IF these rules and regulations, arrived at by supposed infallibility, by councils and college of cardinals, ARE WRONG. What if the very thing Jesus came to tell us, that OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE FROM MAN AND NOT FROM GOD, has been perverted, yet again? WHAT IF what He wants of us is as simple as what He told us: Love God with your whole heart and soul and love one another as you love yourselves? There’s nothing there about original sin. There’s nothing there about Holy Days of Obligation. There’s nothing there about purgatory or limbo. St. Augustine said the souls of unbaptized infants went to hell! Is that a God you can believe in? Well, I can’t.

So here you have it: my God I have known my entire life, since infancy (and yes I do remember being an infant). He is beyond everything else, totally loving; He is absolutely merciful; He follows every soul past physical death in pursuit of joining that soul to Himself. He condemns no one since we condemn ourselves upon meeting Him. He allows free will or the creation would have no meaning other than some narcissistic entity. I believe He is bringing all of creation - and all has consciousness (even rocks, because down to the subatomic level consciousness has been proven) - to Himself: the ultimate “mirror image” wherein all that He loves so much can enter His embrace. And then “the eyes of the blind shall open, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongues of the dumb shall sing.”
Why, the “God Particle,” of course!

(NOTE: my reply is a geeky JOKE (as is the original statement) - no need to respond.)
The original statement does not appear to be a joke. 🤷
 
It would be very difficult to make a “sophisticated” answer to your post, because you raise so many points. Forum policy is to have one topic per thread (so you can open multiple threads; CAF is having a summer special - all threads are FREE). This is to prevent threads from becoming a quagmire (though it still happens).

I will make a few observations.

The Church does not teach that the universe is 6,000 years old.

The Church does not teach that the creation story (or stories, as there are two) are literally true. However, if you believe in evolution, as you point out, you must admit that our species had a “Last Common Ancestor” (LCA), a distinct breeding pair from which all homo sapiens arose (they might as well be called Adam and Eve). This is an interesting situation in which a Catholic may reject the literal reading of the Bible, but a scientist must accept it.

The Church has never taught Limbo as a matter of dogma. As the current Catechism says, we have no idea what happens to unbaptized babies, and entrust them to the mercy of God.

What you are really questioning, when you get to the heart of the matter, is whether Jesus entrusted the Church with divine authority. If he did not do that, some of your complaints are valid. But I say he did that. Maybe that should be the focused topic of your next thread.

Cheers!
Might as well be called Adam and Eve?

Please define how the church is correct on this issue of dogma.
 
The original statement does not appear to be a joke. 🤷
I meant to imply that the original statement is laughably silly (ie, a joke) to anyone who has any actual knowledge of subatomic physics.

Rocks have consciousness at the subatomic level? Ha, ha, ha. Which (of the hundreds of) subatomic particles give rocks consciousness? It could only be the “God particle.” (the Higgs Boson). Are there demi-god particles? No! Could any other hadron give a rock consciousness?

(well, I thought it was funny.)
 
WHAT IF these rules and regulations, arrived at by supposed infallibility, by councils and college of cardinals, ARE WRONG. What if the very thing Jesus came to tell us, that OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE FROM MAN AND NOT FROM GOD, has been perverted, yet again? WHAT IF what He wants of us is as simple as what He told us: Love God with your whole heart and soul and love one another as you love yourselves? There’s nothing there about original sin. There’s nothing there about Holy Days of Obligation. There’s nothing there about purgatory or limbo. St. Augustine said the souls of unbaptized infants went to hell! Is that a God you can believe in? Well, I can’t.

So here you have it: my God I have known my entire life, since infancy (and yes I do remember being an infant). He is beyond everything else, totally loving; He is absolutely merciful; He follows every soul past physical death in pursuit of joining that soul to Himself. He condemns no one since we condemn ourselves upon meeting Him. He allows free will or the creation would have no meaning other than some narcissistic entity. I believe He is bringing all of creation - and all has consciousness (even rocks, because down to the subatomic level consciousness has been proven) - to Himself: the ultimate “mirror image” wherein all that He loves so much can enter His embrace. And then “the eyes of the blind shall open, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongues of the dumb shall sing.”

This is Jesus. I’ve met Him. He laughs, He has great joy, He has great sorrow for each creature who suffers (not just Humans); His arms are always open, He offers healing to everyone who approaches Him in faith, He turns no one away. He approaches the serious sinner, most likely many times a day; He uses us, if we let Him, to teach, to testify, to heal (yes, heal) because, through his grace, we are His arms, His feet, His lips, His voice. And He allows His most blessed Mother to stand between us and our dire enemy because she will ultimately defeat that enemy.

I go to Mass because I meet the Lord there in His flesh and blood, not because I fear the condemnation to hell imposed upon me by some human, somewhere, some time. Our love for Him does not make us “safe”, there is no “safety”. Our love for Him does not make us rich, happy, secure, healthy…we live in this world, we are subject to its vicissitudes. Our love for Him makes us His disciples, and perhaps we will be martyred in many ways, and even die physically because of it.

I question not the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ; I question the right of humanity to put limitations on God and to judge one another when there is no true understanding of the other. We don’t all follow the yellow brick road. In some of our paths, there is true horror. Horror beyond belief. Let us remember that.
So all you take from Jesus are the 2 commandments he gives in one moment of his life? You discount all the other things he taught, even that which he taught the apostles that weren’t written down? You discount all the things the apostles taught in Jesus’ name? You discount the earthly authority Christ gave his apostles which was to be then passed on to their successors to continue to lead the Church under guidance by the Holy Spirit? You discount Christ’s promise to remain with his people until the end of time? You believe the Holy Spirit would allow the Church Christ established to lead people to him to fall into err?
 
I meant to imply that the original statement is laughably silly (ie, a joke) to anyone who has any actual knowledge of subatomic physics.

Rocks have consciousness at the subatomic level? Ha, ha, ha. Which (of the hundreds of) subatomic particles give rocks consciousness? It could only be the “God particle.” (the Higgs Boson). Are there demi-god particles? No! Could any other hadron give a rock consciousness?

(well, I thought it was funny.)
I may be guilty of sin for leaving my pet rock way back in the day when it was common for kids to have pet rocks. I never found it a home, and simply discarded it.
To this day I feel that I was guilty of being heartless in that instance. It was my pet afterall.
 
Might as well be called Adam and Eve?

Please define how the church is correct on this issue of dogma.
To which dogma do you refer?

That the Genesis stories of Creation are literally true? (that’s not dogma.)

That all of humanity (homo sapiens) descended from a unique and distinct breeding pair? (that’s not dogma, but it is “scientific dogma” for anyone who believes in evolution.)

That this breeding pair was known, during their lifetime, by the names, “Adam” and “Eve?” (that’s not dogma - they probably had no name, but so what if we call them by those names?)

You can find a summary of the Catholic teaching about the Genesis creation account in this Catholic Answers tract.
 
To which dogma do you refer?

That the Genesis stories of Creation are literally true? (that’s not dogma.)

That all of humanity (homo sapiens) descended from a unique and distinct breeding pair? (that’s not dogma, but it is “scientific dogma” for anyone who believes in evolution.)

That this breeding pair was known, during their lifetime, by the names, “Adam” and “Eve?” (that’s not dogma - they probably had no name, but so what if we call them by those names?)

You can find a summary of the Catholic teaching about the Genesis creation account in this Catholic Answers tract.
Are you telling me that I do not have to believe that Adam and Eve were the first literal persons?
Did dogma change after the last time I hashed this out here?

All of humanity descended from a unique and distinct breeding pair?>

WHAT???
 
This appears to be the science versus God conflict. It’s been gone over many times.
  1. Adam and Eve are our first parents.
  2. Original Sin is transmitted to all.
Peace,
Ed
 
This appears to be the science versus God conflict. It’s been gone over many times.
  1. Adam and Eve are our first parents.
  2. Original Sin is transmitted to all.
Peace,
Ed
Ed,

He is telling me that Adam and Eve were the distinct breeding pair that homo sapiens descended from.
 
Are you telling me that I do not have to believe that Adam and Eve were the first literal persons?
Are you asking from a Catholic standpoint, or a scientific standpoint?

If you are asking from a religious standpoint, then the answer is “no.”

If you are asking from a scientific standpoint, from someone who accepts both evolution and DNA biology, the answer is “yes,” with the caveat that this first breeding pair might have not been called by the names “Adam” and “Eve” in their lifetime.
Did dogma change after the last time I hashed this out here?
I’m not familiar with that hashing, but I have provided a Catholic Answers tract that explains the Church’s position, and cites dogmatic sources.
All of humanity descended from a unique and distinct breeding pair?
Only if you accept evolution. The Church does not require this idea.
 
Are you asking from a Catholic standpoint, or a scientific standpoint?

If you are asking from a religious standpoint, then the answer is “no.”

If you are asking from a scientific standpoint, from someone who accepts both evolution and DNA biology, the answer is “yes,” with the caveat that this first breeding pair might have not been called by the names “Adam” and “Eve” in their lifetime.

I’m not familiar with that hashing, but I have provided a Catholic Answers tract that explains the Church’s position, and cites dogmatic sources.

Only if you accept evolution. The Church does not require this idea.
Can I ask you what you have for sources to back your idea that evolution teaches that there was a literal Adam and Eve or even one literal breeding pair?
You are really giving me a headache here as the literal Adam and Eve thing has been rehashed beyond belief here.
Yes, I must believe it or never be catholic. This is why I am not a Catholic.
 
Can I ask you what you have for sources to back your idea that evolution teaches that there was a literal Adam and Eve or even one literal breeding pair?
Evolution teaches that ALL life on earth (all five Kingdoms, plants, animals, fungi, etc - but not rocks) come from ONE SINGLE organism - a one-celled organism that is known as the Last Common Universal Ancestor(LUCA). All the fish, and flowers, and bacteria, and foxes, and birds, and dinosaurs, and bees, and humans evolved from one distinct single-celled organism. We don’t know a lot about this organism, but we know many things (as the article I cited will attest). We know that it had properties that were very similar to yeast (one of the most simple single-celled organisms today).

This one-celled critter was the last COMMON ancestor. Meaning ALL life on earth arose from it. But biological science further subdivides life forms into many categories (types). Commonly, the most specific type is the species, which belongs to a genis. We are of the species sapien, of the genus homo. We are thus biologically classified as “homo sapiens.”

There have been other species of the homo genus, but we are the only surviving species.
We are thus a somewhat rare class of monotypic taxon in which all other members of our genus have died out.

According to genetics and evolution, all specific species have a single and distinct original breeding pair known as the Last Common Ancestor. Our LCA is what genetically makes us homo sapiens (as opposed to homo erectus, or any other homo-whatever). Evolution and genetics teach that our genus/species originated from a single breeding pair. We might call them Adam and Eve.
Yes, I must believe it or never be catholic. This is why I am not a Catholic.
I believe in evolution, and I am a Catholic. I believe that God is the causative agent of all biodiversity (not random chance, as many believe). I can be a faithful son of the Church with these beliefs.
 
Evolution teaches that ALL life on earth (all five Kingdoms, plants, animals, fungi, etc - but not rocks) come from ONE SINGLE organism - a one-celled organism that is known as the Last Common Universal Ancestor(LUCA). All the fish, and flowers, and bacteria, and foxes, and birds, and dinosaurs, and bees, and humans evolved from one distinct single-celled organism. We don’t know a lot about this organism, but we know many things (as the article I cited will attest). We know that it had properties that were very similar to yeast (one of the most simple single-celled organisms today).

This one-celled critter was the last COMMON ancestor. Meaning ALL life on earth arose from it. But biological science further subdivides life forms into many categories (types). Commonly, the most specific type is the species, which belongs to a genis. We are of the species sapien, of the genus homo. We are thus biologically classified as “homo sapiens.”

There have been other species of the homo genus, but we are the only surviving species.
We are thus a somewhat rare class of monotypic taxon in which all other members of our genus have died out.

According to genetics and evolution, all specific species have a single and distinct original breeding pair known as the Last Common Ancestor. Our LCA is what genetically makes us homo sapiens (as opposed to homo erectus, or any other homo-whatever). Evolution and genetics teach that our genus/species originated from a single breeding pair. We call them Adam and Eve.

I believe in evolution, and I am a Catholic. I believe that God is the causative agent of all biodiversity (not random chance, as many believe). I can be a faithful son of the Church with these beliefs.
You still evade my question to provide a source for your position that evolution teaches that we have originated from a single breeding pair.
You can not, because that would not be true.
There has never been a bottleneck like that.
Everyone here demands better citations than wiki.
I demand you cite something other than wishful thinking or wiki.
 
You still evade my question to provide a source for your position that evolution teaches that we have originated from a single breeding pair.
You can not, because that would not be true.
There has never been a bottleneck like that.
Everyone here demands better citations than wiki.
I demand you cite something other than wishful thinking or wiki.
OK, fine. From the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of Connecticut
www-bac.esi.umontreal.ca/~dbin1001/h06/presentations/transferts-horizontaux/HGT_genome_Olga_TIG_2004.pdf
It was cited and footnoted in the Wikipedia article that I referred to. Did you bother to check the references before you impugned the source?

You can’t believe everything you read on the internet, but you can believe quite a lot (especially if it is reliably cited).

FWIW, I overstepped my assertion that ALL life on earth originated from a single one-celled organism. It is possible that life originated from more than one. The probability of this is 10 raised to the power or 2860 (cited here). FWIW, there are estimated to be 10 raised to the power of 80 atoms in the universe.
 
OK, fine. From the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of Connecticut
www-bac.esi.umontreal.ca/~dbin1001/h06/presentations/transferts-horizontaux/HGT_genome_Olga_TIG_2004.pdf
It was cited and footnoted in the Wikipedia article that I referred to. Did you bother to check the references before you impugned the source?

You can’t believe everything you read on the internet, but you can believe quite a lot (especially if it is reliably cited).
It is not a reliable citation, not to mention you can not speak about this fluidly from a catholic standpoint.
Where is Granny when I need her?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top