D
DaMaMaXiMuS
Guest
Hello all,
My sister got married at our local parish in 2004. From what I understand she only has been baptised in the church and done only one of the other two sacraments. I think it’s communion. But the point being she didn’t have all three done when she got married. In addition to this, her husband, also catholic and baptised in the church, has never done the other two sacraments.
Now several people have mentioned to me that they don’t understand how they were allowed to be married, being that they are both catholic and baptised without having the other sacraments. My sister said that the priest who did the wedding said that the other sacraments weren’t necessary.
So is their marriage valid?
Another question, not involving my sister’s marriage. If a married man and women are both catholics but got married in through the courts instead of the church, is their marriage completely invalid or is it valid if they both are baptised catholics and have done their confirmation and 1st communion. Obviously, if they’ve done those sacraments one would ask then why not get married in the church. But just to know the answer to this question let’s imagine that’s the case.
Obviously, if the answer is their marriage is valid then my next question is irrelevent. But assuming the answer were that their marriage were invalid, if they divorced throught the courts that united them in the 1st place, are they free to marry someone else, only this time through the church, done right.
Lil help please.
God Bless,
Nelson
My sister got married at our local parish in 2004. From what I understand she only has been baptised in the church and done only one of the other two sacraments. I think it’s communion. But the point being she didn’t have all three done when she got married. In addition to this, her husband, also catholic and baptised in the church, has never done the other two sacraments.
Now several people have mentioned to me that they don’t understand how they were allowed to be married, being that they are both catholic and baptised without having the other sacraments. My sister said that the priest who did the wedding said that the other sacraments weren’t necessary.
So is their marriage valid?
Another question, not involving my sister’s marriage. If a married man and women are both catholics but got married in through the courts instead of the church, is their marriage completely invalid or is it valid if they both are baptised catholics and have done their confirmation and 1st communion. Obviously, if they’ve done those sacraments one would ask then why not get married in the church. But just to know the answer to this question let’s imagine that’s the case.
Obviously, if the answer is their marriage is valid then my next question is irrelevent. But assuming the answer were that their marriage were invalid, if they divorced throught the courts that united them in the 1st place, are they free to marry someone else, only this time through the church, done right.
Lil help please.
God Bless,
Nelson