I
Israel_Jacob
Guest
Any state law that requires a place of worship to admit a service animal is likely unconstitutional, and here’s why: Legislatures may not make laws that prevent the free practice of religion.According to my friend different states do have different definitions of what service animals (all states recognize seeing eye dogs, but other animals and other service dogs aren’t recognized in all states.) She also indicated that there were a few states where places of worship were allowed to deny them—but she was able to list them on one hand.
Contact with animals is an unclean act in some faith traditions. Faithful who have been in contact with certain animals are ritually unclean and are, therefore, forbidden from practicing some rites of that tradition.
I am fairly certain this is true of some Muslim sects, where a service animal might be allowed in anterooms or meeting spaces, but would be absolutely forbidden in the place of prayer.
If a state legislature were to require that a service animal be admitted, it would place a restriction on that faith’s free practice of religion.
I don’t doubt that some state legislatures have come up with such laws, but don’t expect them to survive a constitutional challenge.
Israel