A
angell1
Guest
while looking for a good definition of servile work, I came across this site
holycrossseminary.com/catholic_FAQs_catechism_pg_3.htm
you can read the relevant section, since it is rather long. but essentially it is saying that the intent does not change the nature of the work so there are things we shouldn’t do, even if we personally find them restful or if we do it for charity
this is the previous canon law
On feast days of precept, Mass is to be heard; there is an abstinence from servile work, legal acts, and likewise, unless there is a special indult or legitimate customs provide otherwise, from public trade, shopping, and other public buying and selling [CIC(1917) can 1248].
but the current catechism doesn’t even use the term servile work anymore. it only says works and affairs that hinder the worship owed to god.
I know there are no more strict prohibitions on specific activities, but if something used to be prohibited, doesn’t it mean that it is not really good for sunday naturally?
I’m just really confused as to which parts of this are doctrinal and which parts are disciplinary.
is there something intrinsic about shopping that caused to be prohibited, for example? is it wrong for sunday in general because it is materialistic and we shouldn’t be focused on buying things? but now we consider it as leisure. is it only a sin if the church specifically says it is and when she doesn’t, it’s not a sin?
I guess it wasn’t just the protestant blue laws that prohibited this kind of thing
historically, what were common things to do on sundays, for example, in the middle ages or renaissance? I know the early Christians were less strict because they lived in a mainly pagan society where they couldn’t really take sundays off.
I’m just trying to understand things in context. the catechism gives a lot of room for interpretation, something could hinder someone for god and be different for another person. and yes, I’ve read st. john Paul II’s dies domini, which I find quite vague as well.
any help is appreciated. thanks
holycrossseminary.com/catholic_FAQs_catechism_pg_3.htm
you can read the relevant section, since it is rather long. but essentially it is saying that the intent does not change the nature of the work so there are things we shouldn’t do, even if we personally find them restful or if we do it for charity
this is the previous canon law
On feast days of precept, Mass is to be heard; there is an abstinence from servile work, legal acts, and likewise, unless there is a special indult or legitimate customs provide otherwise, from public trade, shopping, and other public buying and selling [CIC(1917) can 1248].
but the current catechism doesn’t even use the term servile work anymore. it only says works and affairs that hinder the worship owed to god.
I know there are no more strict prohibitions on specific activities, but if something used to be prohibited, doesn’t it mean that it is not really good for sunday naturally?
I’m just really confused as to which parts of this are doctrinal and which parts are disciplinary.
is there something intrinsic about shopping that caused to be prohibited, for example? is it wrong for sunday in general because it is materialistic and we shouldn’t be focused on buying things? but now we consider it as leisure. is it only a sin if the church specifically says it is and when she doesn’t, it’s not a sin?
I guess it wasn’t just the protestant blue laws that prohibited this kind of thing
historically, what were common things to do on sundays, for example, in the middle ages or renaissance? I know the early Christians were less strict because they lived in a mainly pagan society where they couldn’t really take sundays off.
I’m just trying to understand things in context. the catechism gives a lot of room for interpretation, something could hinder someone for god and be different for another person. and yes, I’ve read st. john Paul II’s dies domini, which I find quite vague as well.
any help is appreciated. thanks