Sexual Exposure Chart (Must See!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter PLAL
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow that is quite the exponential chart.:o Great info for all, these days.
 
That is rather cool, but I doubt that are “friends” who promote various concepts of “safe sex” and sex education will be posting that in the public schools.
 
teancum79 said:
That is rather cool, but I doubt that are “friends” who promote various concepts of “safe sex” and sex education will be posting that in the public schools.
Click to expand...
I went to public school and was taught all about safe sex. They also talked about this very fact…so you stand corrected.
 
onetimeposter said:
I went to public school and was taught all about safe sex. They also talked about this very fact…so you stand corrected.
Click to expand...
There’s no such thing as “safe sex” so this public school must have not taught very well on the subject matter.

Please listen online to Jason Evert’s talk. Click on “Catholic High School” and listen to the talk. If you don’t have time to listen to all of it, at the minimum forward to the 1 hour mark of the talk and then listen for 10-15 minutes.

pureloveclub.com/seminars/index.php?id=3

Thank You

PLAL
 
PLAL said:
There’s no such thing as “safe sex”.
Click to expand...
God bless you for saying something. I don’t know why this misconception is so widespread!

When someone tries to suggest that sex is “safe” I ask them why, then, can women who have only ever been with partners while contracepting with condoms still be diagnosed with HPV related cervical cancer? Even non-consummate sexual acts can lead to very, very serious consequences in terms of sexually transmitted infections and diseases, not to mention the emotional damage- and most importantly, the way it offends our Lord.

Sex is not safe, and never can be. I hazard that it may be the most dangerous thing we do in our lives.
 
Had this hanging on my fridge for a while. The kids took notice.
 
I was hoping for more.😦 Are people really this bad at math that they need a picture chart? 🤷 Everyone knows this, if not I think this more a problem with basic education than chastity.
 
PLAL said:
There’s no such thing as “safe sex” so this public school must have not taught very well on the subject matter.

Please listen online to Jason Evert’s talk. Click on “Catholic High School” and listen to the talk. If you don’t have time to listen to all of it, at the minimum forward to the 1 hour mark of the talk and then listen for 10-15 minutes.

pureloveclub.com/seminars/index.php?id=3

Thank You

PLAL
Click to expand...
‘**Safer **sex’ ( your playing semantics)
 
ghaybyers1 said:
Sex is not safe, and never can be. I hazard that it may be the most dangerous thing we do in our lives.
Click to expand...
I agree, and if people make the choice to do it, they should be armed with all the facts on how they can better protect themselves.
 
Rats, the graph should have started at 0; it would have a more profound effect on others. I love how they automatically assume everyone is promiscuous. What about Wilt Chamberlain? Can anyone do the math?
 
onetimeposter said:
I agree, and if people make the choice to do it, they should be armed with all the facts on how they can better protect themselves.
Click to expand...
I agree! And the best way to protect yourself is… Don’t put yourself in a dangerous situation!

😃
 
gmags2003 said:
Rats, the graph should have started at 0; it would have a more profound effect on others. I love how they automatically assume everyone is promiscuous. What about Wilt Chamberlain? Can anyone do the math?
Click to expand...
I do agree starting with zero would have been better. I didn’t see it as stating that everyone was promiscuous. The one person you have sex with could just as easily be your spouse. To me it was more along the lines of if you have sex with this number of people this is the number of people you are really having sex with.
 
PLAL said:
I thought this is something everyone should take a look at…
Sexual Exposure Chart

pureloveclub.com/chastity/index.php?id=7&entryid=200
Click to expand...
A) I have no idea where they are getting those numbers or what they mean. Well, I do “get” the first line. 😛 But if I have sex with two people, Bob and Sue, and both Bob and Sue have sex with two people, say Bob had sex with me and Jim, and Sue had sex with me and Sally, then I had sex with Bob, Sue, Jim, and Sally. That is four people. They say 3. What are they assuming to get these numbers?

B) Perhaps the concept of “if you have sex with someone, you are having sex with everyone else they have had sex with” is effective rhetoric, I don’t know. But I disagree with the concept itself, depending on what it is really trying to say. What is it trying to say? Is it trying to say that I am at the same risk of getting a venereal disease if I have sex with someone who had sex with someone who has a venereal disease than if I directly have sex with someone who has a venereal disease?
 
People who use the term “safe sex” who are modifying semantics to inaccurately portray the realities. It’s not “safe sex,” when one uses modern safeguarding techniques. I very much wish “safe sex” was called “safer sex,” because that would portray the reality and might convince more people to wait. That might save lives.

On the other hand, people might feel safer with promiscuous behavior if they think they’re practicing “safe sex.” The risk of them receiving an STD increases substantially if they have more partners.

Semantics matter ;). We need words that portray the realities, not words that hide them.
 
Lief_Erikson said:
People who use the term “safe sex” who are modifying semantics to inaccurately portray the realities. It’s not “safe sex,” when one uses modern safeguarding techniques. I very much wish “safe sex” was called “safer sex,” because that would portray the reality and might convince more people to wait. That might save lives.

On the other hand, people might feel safer with promiscuous behavior if they think they’re practicing “safe sex.” The risk of them receiving an STD increases substantially if they have more partners.

Semantics matter ;). We need words that portray the realities, not words that hide them.
Click to expand...
Good points:thumbsup:
It kinda begs the questions of:

Safe from what?

In our innocence I think we assume they’re referring to being safe from venerial disease, but what I think they’re referring to by “safe sex” is free from conception, as though conception was a danger on par with disease and/or that pregnancy is a disease.

None of the contraceptives are 100% safe in preventing either disease or pregnancy. They all lessen the chances of contracting *some *venerial diseases and they all have a failure rate regarding pregnancy. Not one of them are even remotely as effective as abstinence.

According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Fact Sheet for Public Health Personnel; Male Latex Condoms
and Sexually Transmitted Diseases
The surest way to avoid transmission of sexually transmitted diseases is to abstain from sexual intercourse, or to be in a long-term mutually monogamous relationship with a partner who has been tested and you know is uninfected.
Click to expand...
For persons whose sexual behaviors place them at risk for STDs, correct and consistent use of the male latex condom **can reduce the risk **of STD transmission. However, no protective method is 100 percent effective, and condom use cannot guarantee absolute protection against any STD.
Click to expand...
Abstinence is the only 100% proven method.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top