Sexual Revolution Reaches Logical Conclusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sir2v4
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Having lived through it and watching its planned integration into “mainstream” media, I know what I’m talking about. And “What we are experiencing today is a radical polarization being fought at the extremes with everyone, with the excepting of a few, becoming a victim.” Please define what this ‘radical polarization’ is with a few examples. It sounds like most people becoming a victim is not progress.
 
Since the 1920s?

The world has warred against the Church since the day of Pentecost in A.D. 30.
 
So people are monogamous and have sex, but it is not okay to casually date multiple people because it is assumed you are having sex with them all?
 
Yes, it is typically considered “cheating” to date multiple people at once, but I also think that it is more acceptable and widespread to have multiple friends of the opposite sex now. I’m 30 now and married. In my 20s I “dated” perhaps two women before my wife and in both cases it was exclusive and serious… but I freely hung out with many women friends in a platonic manner.
 
So did I. I dated one young lady at a time, and had lady friends too. I’m friends with married women.
 
You didn’t answer my question.
Are you sure?

I agreed that no progress is being made, and gave you an example of people at opposite ends.

For something a tad more radical.

In his radio show, on YouTube and on his Infowars website, Jones… has been announcing that the United States is on the verge of a bloody second civil war. Like the radio DJs in Rwanda, Jones has been egging on his conservative listeners and viewers—an estimated 2.7 million people monthly—to kill more liberal fellow citizens over their political differences.
Newt Gingrich opined on Fox that “we are in a clear-cut cultural civil war.” Former GOP speechwriter Pat Buchanan wrote that the appointment of a special prosecutor and political street clashes presage a “deep state media coup” and that the nation is “approaching something of a civil war…”
 
Last edited:
Alex Jones? Really? I was hearing about white/black race wars in the 1970s. I’m more concerned about mentally unstable persons like the Las Vegas shooter who had a lot of weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition. You need to fire a lot more rounds than 600 to hit 500 to 580 people with an automatic weapon.

No, we are in a clear cut Culture War between the religious and secularists. Some religious types may be heavily armed but most of us are not. The Left may or may not be planning a Civil War, I don’t know. The current President is an incidental and bumbling figure. “Inciting to riot” is not a good thing, much less advocating killing people. I’m sure the FBI is on this for its obvious National Security implications. “deep state media coup” is gibberish for “the media affects too many people in a negative way.” I’ve been saying and watching that for years. Read up on COINTELPRO.
 
Last edited:
It may be more widespread. It wasn’t unacceptable to have platonic friends of the opposite sex several decades ago, except that older people never seemed to think opposite-sex friendships could ever be platonic. People my own age then (i.e. 20s) seemed to get it okay.
 
Last edited:
When the radicals and anarchists showed up in our neighborhoods, we listened to them. The Bible says to welcome the stranger but they were wolves, and along with their counterparts in the Church, told us a new gospel. But some of us were too trusting. Before some families knew it, their kids had become converted. Sex, illegal drugs, no respect for mom and dad and cohabitation with sex. The Church was NOT to be listened to. Authority figures meant nothing. They promised us a bright future but that was all a bunch of baloney. Soon, their drug dealer buddies showed up in our neighborhoods and got to some kids in school. Shacking up, addiction, welfare… that was freedom to them. Then other players appeared pushing The Pill. Yeah, they sowed evil. They increased temptations. And corruption. It pained me to watch it start happening.
Yes, to be fair to the 1960’s generation, things were starting to go bad even before that decade, It just became a perfect storm of widespread evil that even the Church was unable to keep outside of its sanctuaries. Even during the turn of the 20th century, Popes like Leo XIII and Pius X had already seen the early signs of what was going to explode during the 1960’s. Before the 1960’s a lot of the evil was there, suppressed and secret, but it was still there, not easily exposed by mass and social media.

All the temptations, from sex to drugs, to violence , to disregard for authority and morality were presented to a youth that understandably wanted nothing to do with the authorities that wanted to send them to die in a war that in hindsight did nothing for them or our nation.
 
If you are referring to the Vietnam War, the tide against it really began in 1968, and it had nothing to do with the Sexual Revolution. After the War, the protestors went back to a life of doing what they wanted when they wanted, like lots of sex and drugs. There was no perfect storm. The agitators started their war against the Church in 1966, including people inside and outside the Church working together. It was no accident. Yeah, the Beatniks and Anarchists of the 1950s just got new labels. You forget that the goal was to IGNORE and REJECT the Church and mom and dad. Sin? Not for them.

I got my Draft Card for Vietnam and a Hippie friend had gotten Conscientious Objector status. He was willing to write a letter for me.
 
Last edited:
Alex Jones? Really? I was hearing about white/black race wars in the 1970s.
You keep changing the goal posts. You picked up on my post about the counterculture of the 1960s that encompassed the sexual revolution. You seem to find everything that does not filter through you conservative Catholic lens as nonsense, you dismiss science and history as out of hand.
No, we are in a clear cut Culture War between the religious and secularists. Some religious types may be heavily armed but most of us are not. The Left may or may not be planning a Civil War, I don’t know. The current President is an incidental and bumbling figure. “Inciting to riot” is not a good thing, much less advocating killing people. I’m sure the FBI is on this for its obvious National Security implications. “deep state media coup” is gibberish for “the media affects too many people in a negative way.” I’ve been saying and watching that for years. Read up on COINTELPRO.
Oddly, outside of the first sentence, I agree with most of what you are saying here. I have not read cointelpro but I will look into it. You might find NakedCapitalism, which takes a middle ground, interesting.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top