E
EasterJoy
Guest
The general rule is that if some health issue ought to keep them home from school, it ought to keep them home from church, and if it keeps them home from church and school, it ought to keep them home from essentially everything else for that day, too. If the child has an issue that they can go to school with, they ought to use the same or stricter hygiene precautions at church. For instance, if a child has a bad cold of the kind that doesn’t keep them home from school, they ought to wash their hands often, keep their hands from their face, cough away from people, refrain from touching anyone, and so on.
I would actually use a stricter standard for church than for school if you expect to have a lot of elderly people at the Mass or if Mass otherwise presents a more serious reason to avoid spreading the problem than school. If a cold knocks a child down for two weeks, it could knock an older person down for far longer.
As for nits, I would assume that you did not get all of them yet, and keep your child home for one day after the original treatment. That is not an onerous amount of time or a frivolous reason to miss Mass when it could save others from such a bothersome infestation.
This could answer more of your questions:
schoolhealthservicesny.com/faq.cfm?subpage=80
*Should schools have a “No-Nit” Policy?
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) attempts to clarify diagnosis and treatment of head lice and makes recommendations for dealing with this condition in school. Among its recommendations, the AAP says no healthy child should be excluded from, or allowed to miss school because of head lice, and that “no nit” policies for return to school should be discouraged. Numerous anecdotal reports exist of children missing weeks of school and even being forced to repeat a grade because of head lice. Although not painful or a serious health hazard, head lice are the cause of much embarrassment and misunderstanding, many unnecessary days lost from school and work, and millions of dollars spent on remedies. The AAP recommendations for treating head lice also include:
◦School personnel responsible for detecting head lice should be appropriately trained, as it can be difficult to diagnose.
◦Permethrin 1 percent (an insecticide) is currently the recommended treatment for head lice.
◦Head lice screening programs in schools do not have a significant effect on the incidence of head lice, and are not cost-effective. Parent education programs may be a more appropriate management tool.
◦Manually removing nits after medication for killing lice is not necessary to prevent spread. However it may be prudent to remove nits in school-aged children to decrease the chance of misdiagnosis. Nit removal is tedious and often cannot be accomplished in one sitting. *
I would actually use a stricter standard for church than for school if you expect to have a lot of elderly people at the Mass or if Mass otherwise presents a more serious reason to avoid spreading the problem than school. If a cold knocks a child down for two weeks, it could knock an older person down for far longer.
As for nits, I would assume that you did not get all of them yet, and keep your child home for one day after the original treatment. That is not an onerous amount of time or a frivolous reason to miss Mass when it could save others from such a bothersome infestation.
This could answer more of your questions:
schoolhealthservicesny.com/faq.cfm?subpage=80
*Should schools have a “No-Nit” Policy?
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) attempts to clarify diagnosis and treatment of head lice and makes recommendations for dealing with this condition in school. Among its recommendations, the AAP says no healthy child should be excluded from, or allowed to miss school because of head lice, and that “no nit” policies for return to school should be discouraged. Numerous anecdotal reports exist of children missing weeks of school and even being forced to repeat a grade because of head lice. Although not painful or a serious health hazard, head lice are the cause of much embarrassment and misunderstanding, many unnecessary days lost from school and work, and millions of dollars spent on remedies. The AAP recommendations for treating head lice also include:
◦School personnel responsible for detecting head lice should be appropriately trained, as it can be difficult to diagnose.
◦Permethrin 1 percent (an insecticide) is currently the recommended treatment for head lice.
◦Head lice screening programs in schools do not have a significant effect on the incidence of head lice, and are not cost-effective. Parent education programs may be a more appropriate management tool.
◦Manually removing nits after medication for killing lice is not necessary to prevent spread. However it may be prudent to remove nits in school-aged children to decrease the chance of misdiagnosis. Nit removal is tedious and often cannot be accomplished in one sitting. *