J
JimG
Guest
Yes, as long as you are dead. But that is the question.IF someone else can use what I no longer need, by all means take it.
Yes, as long as you are dead. But that is the question.IF someone else can use what I no longer need, by all means take it.
I have a question about Terri Schiavo. If she was “brain dead” how did her body keep functioning? Was life support given for her organs, or her brain? Does anyone know how life support was used in this instance? I watched a bit of the controversy on TV. She looked alive to me.Ok - here is something else to think about. Do any of you remember Terri Schiavo? She was considered “brain dead” by the “medical profession” but many Catholics and other people fought long and hard for her right to live. She was being kept alive by “artificial” means. In the end, the law won. Not God’s law - man’s law. How are others who are deemed “brain dead” any different?
Annie
Terri Schiavo was never diagnosed ‘brain dead’ by any doctor. That is what the media said. The doctors said she was in a Persistent Vegetative State. The only assistance she was receiving was the feeding tube. Heart beating by itself, lungs breathing, liver and kidneys functioning, nor was she in a coma until they stopped feeding her. If you stop feeding anyone, they will die.I have a question about Terri Schiavo. If she was “brain dead” how did her body keep functioning? Was life support given for her organs, or her brain? Does anyone know how life support was used in this instance? I watched a bit of the controversy on TV. She looked alive to me.
I believe that’s a Christian Science perspective, and not a Catholic one you are sharing. If that is the thinking behind the morality of organ donation, then it has to be applied to all taking of medications, because if you are taking medication, you are robbing God of the opportunity for a miracle. Let God heal your diabetes, let God heal your stroke, don’t get in the way of a miracle.I agree. I also think that if we decide that it is ok to end another’s life (even if they gave permission) then we rob God of the opportunity for a miracle.
Annie
There is? Where? That’s a pretty frightening statement, Can you back it up with some sources?I am torn on the issue. There is a major medical industry profiting from the canibalization of human bodies
Yes, as long as you are dead. But that is the question.
Looks like there’s a need for interpretation here by a moral theologian, and I’m not onecCC # 2296
** ** Organ transplants are in conformity with the moral law if the physical and psychological dangers and risks to the donor are proportionate to the good that is sought for the recipient. Organ donation after death is a noble and meritorous act and is to be encouraged as an expression of generous solidarity. It is not morally acceptable if the donor or his proxy has not given explicit consent. Moreover, it is not morally admissible directly to bring about the disabling mutilation or death of a human being, even in order to delay the death of other persons.****
Yes. The key phrase in the section you quoted is “after death.” The question is: Is this person alive or dead? Now if a patient’s heart stops and cannot be restarted, the EKG is a flat-line, and THEN we put the patient on a respirator to oxygenate the organs for removal, that is less problematic than simply calling a patient brain dead who is still breathing and has a heartbeat.Looks like there’s a need for interpretation here by a moral theologian, and I’m not one*** “bring about the …death of a human being.”*** I think that in legitimate hospital based organ retrieval, the person would have died naturally, but is being artificially kept “alive” on life support for the purpose of saving the organs. The person for all intents and purposes is dead. Once someone is brain dead, the heart could still be healthy, and the lungs and kidneys, if on life support and not left to “die.”
So, this would bring up the theological question: “Where is our soul?” Does it have a bodily residence? What about the resurrection of the body? When does our soul leave our body? When our heart stops, and our blood stops circulating, or when there is no brain function?
We believe life begins at conception. When does our natural earthly life end? At the time the Dr. declares it on the medical record? What about when there is no Dr?
It would seem obvious that the hospitals, doctors, nurses,etc, etc, etc, all have profit from their involvement in the transplant. but here are a few examples of the money being brought into the medical industry by transplants.There is? Where? That’s a pretty frightening statement, Can you back it up with some sources?
It would seem obvious that the hospitals, doctors, nurses,etc, etc, etc, all have profit from their involvement in the transplant. but here are a few examples of the money being brought into the medical industry by transplants.
transplantmanagement.com/professional_services_medicare.htm
tylerpaper.com/article/20080220/OPINION0311/802190340
chfpatients.com/tx/transplant.htm
When a transplant is completed they ring the register to a tune much greater than would be seen allowing a donor to pass on slowly. I don’t know if this is a motivation for those making decisions to transplant but for me I am not sure I want to bet my life that they wouldn’t cut me up to make a buck.
I still think the greater good is that someone who would have died iis now able to live because of an organ transplant. “Greater love has no man, than to lay down his life for his friends.” I think Judas was the recipient of 30 pieces of silver for his part in the death of Jesus. Christ’s death on the cross was far more meritorious in that he purchased the salvation of many by his one death.“Organ donation after death is a noble and meritorious act and is to be encouraged as an expression of generous solidarity.” CCC. 2296
Agreed. And I do trust my doctor but do not know if I would trust an emergency room doctor I never met.I still think the greater good is that someone who would have died iis now able to live because of an organ transplant. “Greater love has no man, than to lay down his life for his friends.”
If the Church says it’s noble and meritorious, then it is. I think it would be more valuable to sacrifice whatever is left on a monitor of my own vegetative life so that someone else may live and perhaps come into the Kingdom of Heaven.Personally, I won’t be an organ donor because of the simple fact that nobody knows exactly when true death really occurs. I don’t want to be put to death prematurely.
Im’ sure this has already been stated, but I wanted to pseudo-correct you.the body is still alive when the organs are harvested
I am having trouble seeing the problem in the links. I see the links talking about managing staff salaries and equipment costs, how less organs are available due to non-payment of donors, and a brief overview of heart transplants.It would seem obvious that the hospitals, doctors, nurses,etc, etc, etc, all have profit from their involvement in the transplant. but here are a few examples of the money being brought into the medical industry by transplants.
transplantmanagement.com/professional_services_medicare.htm
tylerpaper.com/article/20080220/OPINION0311/802190340
chfpatients.com/tx/transplant.htm
When a transplant is completed they ring the register to a tune much greater than would be seen allowing a donor to pass on slowly. I don’t know if this is a motivation for those making decisions to transplant but for me I am not sure I want to bet my life that they wouldn’t cut me up to make a buck.
You are right that the hospitals are over burdened and are strained with patients who rack up bills they can not pay. While most care givers do not succom to the financial preasures, I find it plausible that the administrators will consider those preasures and as a result may hire doctors who are “financially responsible”.