So if I want citizenship there it is easier than for “non-ethnics”
as should be…our roots don’t just “go away” within one generation because of political change.
On a whole, the “statelessness” issue is closely related to “migrations” and “fundamental rights”. What bothers me, is the haste in “dehumanizing” that’s so common in media these days (and how the trend starting with media contaminates everyday persons lacking critical thinking).
If you heard the 3 minute piece
@Emeraldlady linked -imho very good!- it described 62 WOMAN&CHILDREN in a refugee camp that have, IN FACT, nationality. It used to be said: “woman and children first”, seems in today’s world those basic notions are lost…
Soo…Some areas of the media want to “dehumanize” stateless refugees frivolously throwing around the label “terrorism” as a misnomer. Of those 62 human beings -at this point- I’m willing to bet not even 3 partake of “terrorist ideals”, or had any real material involvement in anything criminal. (Most accounts place woman and children locked in their homes, because it wasn’t safe to walk the streets.)
“Dehumanizing discourse”, CONTRAST → I’ll bet you that’s what caused the Christchurch shooting in NZ - and all modern shootings:
“dehumanizing discourse” that becomes mentality. We’d hope
Australia’s history of massacres would have taught folks to avoid “hate speech” in its “dehumanizing” form, to somehow quell
“the State” from reasserting its authority through brutality in discourse - in this case pretending to deny nationality to its own citizens without due legal process, assuming them as guilty without proof.
Having quoted the “math” that creates and generates these “social (human) problems” I’ll just remind, by contrast, that no Chinese millionaire shall be deprived of Australian nationality just so long as they can afford the expenses.
And perhaps “deprogramming” should be called “re-humanizing”.