D
Dancelittleewok
Guest
Seeing John Haggee on “God’s Warriors” got me thinking. I was wondering if Christians should support Israel, particularly the Zionist movement. What do you think?
Throughout history empires have risen and fallen; soon the US will be relegated to the shadows of the EU India and China. If your country wants to make a difference it better get a move alongAs Americans, we should support the United States – which is the last, best hope for humanity.
Cleanse your finger before you point at our spots.Throughout history empires have risen and fallen; soon the US will be relegated to the shadows of the EU India and China. If your country wants to make a difference it better get a move along
Has allies of convenience really worked out for us? In hindsight was teaming up with Sadam because we had a mutual enemy in Iran smart? And, of course, helping Osama in Afghanistan because he was fighting the Soviets didn’t reap much in the way of long term benefits. Of course, thinking of Osama, we have to consider our good friendship with the House of Saud, which provided $70 billion to Wahabi extremism and citizens to carry out 9/11.As Americans, we should support the United States – which is the last, best hope for humanity.
To the extent that other nations’ interests are congruent with our interests, we should support them.
When interests diverge, when auld acquaintences be forgot – keep your eye on the Grand Old Flag.
Show support? Probably yes. Show blind, unending support? Of course not.Seeing John Haggee on “God’s Warriors” got me thinking. I was wondering if Christians should support Israel, particularly the Zionist movement. What do you think?
Give us a lecture on Spikeman and Mackinder, will you?Has allies of convenience really worked out for us? In hindsight was teaming up with Sadam because we had a mutual enemy in Iran smart? And, of course, helping Osama in Afghanistan because he was fighting the Soviets didn’t reap much in the way of long term benefits. Of course, thinking of Osama, we have to consider our good friendship with the House of Saud, which provided $70 billion to Wahabi extremism and citizens to carry out 9/11.
And, since old friends would not drop into lock step with our ambitions in Iraq, we found a new friendship in Pakistan. Of course, seemingly harboring Osama, while providing assistance to other enemies in weapons of mass destruction has me a little skeptical about the long term benefits of that relationship as well…
I know that individuals like George Weigel take it as Gospel that combining pure self interest, pragmatic alliances, and the selective exportation of Democracy at the point of a gun is the perfect blueprint for the century, but I am hard pressed to find a single instance were pursuit of such a policies has not been a complete and costly disaster.
As Americans, we should support the United States – which is the last, best hope for humanity.
To the extent that other nations’ interests are congruent with our interests, we should support them.
When interests diverge, when auld acquaintences be forgot – keep your eye on the Grand Old Flag.
It’s interesting you first quote the prayer for the peace of Jerusalem because I’ve seen some of the Hagee “gospel” mentioned by the OP and it calls for use of nuclear weapons and seems to stress that the antichrist will be a man of peace.Yes, we are obligated to support Israel. The OT says Pray for the peace of Jerusalem. They shall prosper that love (it). Also, God says that He will bless them that bless (Israel) and curse them that curse (Israel). There is both blessings and curses in how we treat Israel, God’s chosen.
The Romans were ‘occupiers’ and ‘rulers’ over the lands they conquered. The inhabitants were ‘subjects’ of the Romans. The Romans conquered lands to expand their wealth and their lands. They needed the ‘subjects’ to pay ‘tribute.’Sorry, but even with the Romans ruling (and oppressing) Israel, nowhere in the Gospels do we see Jesus advocating the taking up of arms to remove them.
I wasn’t drawing a parallel with Hamas etc, I was just pointing out that even with Israel occupied by the Romans (a big deal by worldly standards) Jesus seemed to think there were more important things to be concerned about, or to put it another way, despite the challenges to Israel as a nation, His main concern was (and I believe still is) the state of their relationship with God. Seems like that should be ours too. Ultimately, once that is fixed, other things fall into line. Seek ye first…The Romans were ‘occupiers’ and ‘rulers’ over the lands they conquered. The inhabitants were ‘subjects’ of the Romans. The Romans conquered lands to expand their wealth and their lands. They needed the ‘subjects’ to pay ‘tribute.’
In the case of Hamas and other terrorist groups, and for that matter terrorist nations like Syria, they have vowed to ‘exterminate’ the Jews and wipe them off the face of the earth. They hate the Jews. They want to kill them.
I think the parallel to the Romans you used was in error, motives and ends are different.
It seems to me that there is no way to not draw a parallel in the way you wrote your response.I wasn’t drawing a parallel with Hamas etc, I was just pointing out that even with Israel occupied by the Romans (a big deal by worldly standards) Jesus seemed to think there were more important things to be concerned about, or to put it another way, despite the challenges to Israel as a nation, His main concern was (and I believe still is) the state of their relationship with God. Seems like that should be ours too. Ultimately, once that is fixed, other things fall into line. Seek ye first…