I think Richard Dawkins would be fine with his degrees. It’s more that he’s without God that’s the problem…
Right! But, you see, that to God, his advanced learning and his intellect is pretty puny and not far off that of the Amish farmer. It has no merit in God’s eyes.
Who do you think God is more pleased with: an Amish farmer with a 8th grade education who lives a virtuous life and loves God or Richard Dawkins with his degrees who mocks God?
Of course, the best scenario is a Fulteen Sheen. Someone with much learning who uses it to bring people closer to God. That’s the Catholic ideal.
Another thought I have is that it all depends on the quality of the education. It’s very possible for an eighth grade education to surpass that of a high school grad.
I love reading and learning. I am grateful for its gift. But, none of my study or reading has made me more holy. Occasionally, I’ll have insights that if I apply them in my conduct, prayer life, or integrate into my thoughts–then I might become more virtuous, more pleasing to God. Or, if it’s God’s will that I use those skills/knowledge to serve my brothers and sisters better, then I’ve used that training to please God.
But, an illiterate housewife who gives all of herself to God by serving her family is as pleasing to God as a surgeon who gives all of himself to God in his work.
The difference is that our society exalts the doctor and not the humble housewife.
I believe that that is near the point that Ceil was trying to make.
If you gain the world, but lose your soul in the process…