Should he go tell the police?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fineca
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fineca

Guest
I got a question from an Evangelical Christian that seems quite tricky. He hasn’t got any clear answers from his pastors and none of the priests I wrote to replied. Here’s the issue.
Before he became a believer he was a criminal, something to do with drugs and stealing and such. Now he wonders what the Christian/Catholic faith says about whether he should/must go tell the police about what he has done in the past or not. Please give some informed answers:) Thank you!
 
Depending how long ago his actions were, the statute of limitations might be over, and there can no longer be a chance to prosecute.

But say he committed a crime that the police are still investigating he should turn himself in. So basically if he committed a felony, yes. Personal drug use and petty theft might not be felonies. But I’m not a lawyer.

If he stole something, what would be a good thing to do is to make restitution to the victim if possible.
 
Absolutely not!

Making restitution if you can is one thing and maybe necessary. Going to the police wont serve this new creature in Christ and do any good for what was done in the past.

Keep you mouth shut and provide restitution, even if it is working at the soup kitchen.
 
I got a question from an Evangelical Christian that seems quite tricky. He hasn’t got any clear answers from his pastors and none of the priests I wrote to replied. Here’s the issue.
Before he became a believer he was a criminal, something to do with drugs and stealing and such. Now he wonders what the Christian/Catholic faith says about whether he should/must go tell the police about what he has done in the past or not. Please give some informed answers:) Thank you!
What’s in the past is over and done with. I can tell you from professional experience that the police will not be interested in his confession unless there was a murder, bank robbery or other very serious felony committed. They are busy enough.

Also, going to jail and (or) losing employment over something that cannot be changed or taken back will certainly be harmful to his family. Prayer, confession and restitution are the best route.

Tell your friend to go make some restitution for his wrongs if it can be done without harming his family or others. If restitution isn’t practicle, then he can always donate some time or money to charity.

😉
 
It depends on when the crimes were commited. Also, God may be calling this friend to confess. And, yes, restitution may be required. But we shouldn’t keep quiet about something if it lays heavy on our hearts and minds.
 
It depends on when the crimes were committed.
No, I cant see it. You cant bring back anyone from the dead by going to jail or getting the needle. You can spend a life in restitution serving your fellow man.
Also, God may be calling this friend to confess. And, yes, restitution may be required. But we shouldn’t keep quiet about something if it lays heavy on our hearts and minds.
Sure it may lay heavy on his or her heart and maybe, well it should. That’s part of screwing up and growth of the human person. If you hear a voice telling you to go to the police, its not our Divine Master.

ONE EXCEPTION!!! IF… someone has been arrested for your crime or heaven forbid, in jail for your crime, then yes, you get a lawyer and go down to the District Attorneys Office and get it off your chest and rescue your innocent brother or sister. In my judgment, no exceptions.
 
No, I cant see it. You cant bring back anyone from the dead by going to jail or getting the needle. You can spend a life in restitution serving your fellow man.
We all have to atone for our sins. If not in this life, then in the next where the punishment will be much worse than anything we can ever imagine in this life.

Who decides what the proper restitution should be? The person who committed the offense? For some reason that doesn’t seem correct. :rolleyes:
 
the Catholic would go to confession, give the relevant details and follow the advice of the priest on what is required as far as restitution. Absolution would not be contingent on restitution but if the priest discerned the person was not contrite he might withhold absolution until such time as the penitent was able to express true contrition. Example would be if this criminal activity or association still exists, or is being enabled by the penitent’s current actions.
 
We all have to atone for our sins. If not in this life, then in the next where the punishment will be much worse than anything we can ever imagine in this life.
Yup, right you are.
Who decides what the proper restitution should be? The person who committed the offense? For some reason that doesn’t seem correct. :rolleyes:
I defer to the above statement. The Divine judge will decide the debt to be paid to His Justice. The individual could go into Pastoral counseling, or, muddle through it as best as he or she can. Who knows? Just there best as there light shows them. In the end, the real bill will be paid.
 
But didn’t Christ give the keys to heaven to His Church?
Yes He has. To his Bride. I guess I see the point your trying to make, however, the courts are not it. The Catholic Church holds the keys.

You wont be satisfied until this guy must join a prison gang or be another inmates ***** to survive one single day inside? Go ahead then, throw the first stone.
 
Yes He has. To his Bride.
Actually, the keys to heaven have to do with the binding and loosening of sin.

There is something called paying one’s debt to society. Since this person is not a Catholic and therefore can not validly turn to a priest for penance, he should seek out the victims and make reparation to them. That’s what one does when one is TRULY sorry for their actions – they try to do whatever is possible to correct the wrong that they have done. Better for this guy to “join a prison gang or be another inmates ***** to survive one single day inside” than to spend that time in purgatory making amends since the church teaches us that we’ll be able to pay our debt in this life with pennies on the dollar compared to what will be expected of us in the next life. Of course, if the person were Catholic, then it would be up to the priest to decide the penance.

If it was a “victimless” crime or where the victims could not be identified or found, then doing what was suggestion is the proper course of action to take for scripture has it that charity toward others atones for a multitude of sins.

And advising someone on what the best course of action to take to avoid or minimize their time in purgatory is far from “casting the first stone”. On the contrary, it is a most charitable action. Doing otherwise would be uncharitable.

Long story, in my youth I once set a church on fire. Being about 10 or 11, I didn’t understand various scientific conceptions and didn’t realize that a fire would result from my actions. So while my actions were intentional, the end result was not. To make matters worse, I lied about my involvement in the matter.

Decades later, this forgot sin came back to memory and I had thought of making amends to the church for the damage that my actions had caused. I estimated the value of the charcoal destroyed and even factored in the time value of money to arrive at a figure that I should contribute to the church in reparation for my sin.

However, I was deciding my own penance in the matter. What if this self-imposed penance did not properly atone for my actions? So I went to a priest and confessed my sin. He was more disturbed about me lying to the original priest than about the fire since the only damage was a box of charcoal.

For my penance, I was told to find the original priest and if I was successful, I was to confess to him and perform whatever penance he gave me. If the original priest was no longer around or I was unsuccessful in locating him after an honest and reasonable effort, then my penance was the attempted search.

After some searching, I found the original priest and confessed to him. He was a bit perplexed in the beginning when I started my confession saying that my last confession was X days ago and for my penance I was told to go to confession with him but once I was done, everything was clear and for my penance I was told to pay to the original parish for the cost of two boxes of charcoal. I looked up the cost on the web and sent them a check for that amount with “donation” written in the memo section.

Would my self-imposed penance have properly atoned for my sins? It MIGHT HAVE since the dollar amount for one box of charcoal adjusted for the time value of money for 35+ years was actually greater than the cost of the two boxes of charcoal that I was told to pay. Or, it may have not. There would have been no way for me to know. But since my penance came from a priest who has the authority to bind & loosen and in my particular case it also came for the original priest that I had lied to in my youth, I know that proper reparation was made – no room for doubt.

That’s the point that I am making with regards to self-imposed penances – they MAY atone for the sin or they may not. Why take the chance IF other alternatives are possible? If other alternatives are not possible, then that is a different story.
 
the Catholic would go to confession, give the relevant details and follow the advice of the priest on what is required as far as restitution…
That’s my suggestion too. The premise of the original post reminds me that we have an innate desire to WANT to confess our sins when we are truly sorry and ready to make a change. Of course, a Christian can talk to Jesus, but then this new Christian shows us that often we are still left with the feeling that we need to confess–to the police or to a therapist, to some other human being with authority. Jesus knew that about us, hence He gave us the Sacrament of Confession.
 
I don’t think the person in the OP must go to the police. He may if he wants to. I wouldn’t advise it if others will suffer as a result such as any children who would not be without a father and breadwinner. However this person must attempt restitution whether to the indivuduals that were harmed by his criminal actions or to others. He obviously is experiencing the appropriate contrition that would be required. A Catholic has a much simpler path since we do have confession.
 
I got a question from an Evangelical Christian that seems quite tricky. He hasn’t got any clear answers from his pastors and none of the priests I wrote to replied. Here’s the issue.
Before he became a believer he was a criminal, something to do with drugs and stealing and such. Now he wonders what the Christian/Catholic faith says about whether he should/must go tell the police about what he has done in the past or not. Please give some informed answers:) Thank you!
I am just throwing an idea out here, because I am not an expert. But I did join the church at Easter Vigil 2007 and I have been a table leader on the RCIA program, going through mystagogie a second time now. Some of my friends say that converts are the best Catholics, have done RCIA as an adult rather than a cradle Catholic. Anyway, even if he is not a confirmed catholic I think that your friend could still seek the counsel of a priest. He cannot receive the sacrament of reconciliation, the absolution of his sin. But he could certainly get a catholic view on his sin, what damage going to the police could cause his family, what good going to the police could do for him, etc. This could be your opportunity to be an apostle and lead your friend to the church! 🙂
 
If he doesn’t recognize the authority of the Catholic faith, why would he seek it’s guidance?
 
If he doesn’t recognize the authority of the Catholic faith, why would he seek it’s guidance?
Many Episcopalians are close to bridging the schism between the Anglican church and the Catholic church. He sought the counsel of a friend who is catholic, why not a priest?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top