I
Irishmom2
Guest
OP,
Where is your integrity leading you though?
Where is your integrity leading you though?
So my research is what led me to admit that I am unconvinced. I will of course remain open to new info but the justification is simply not convincing to me (in this instance). It’s not like I can choose to believe it anyway. Imagine trying to hold a belief in something you find unconvincing. Does that make sense? …and so then follows the discussion above about what Canon Law states about this…the requirement for definitive belief/being in opposition to the Church etc.WillPhillips:![]()
This is the part we are having such a hard time understanding. If you are having doubts or are misunderstanding something, then why not research and learn more until you do understand why the Church teaches it.I can’t make myself believe something I find unconvincing…a specific church doctrine for example (i.e. it’s not like I can choose to lie to myself)
Where you going to go instead, if any church?
Not sure. But wherever I’d have no reason to stop utilizing my values of empathy, compassion, fairness, and honesty.OP,
Where is your integrity leading you though?
Curious (to me) question. But, cradle Catholic. I’d be the first in a very large Catholic family to leave. Two first cousins are priests and my father was a seminarian for many years. Grew up very involved in the Church (school, retreats, alter server, etc).OP, are you a cradle Catholic or a convert to Catholicism?
That’s a very great and blessed heritage. I know for my life, I had to step away from the Evangelical/Pentecostal church also for 10 years. I wanted to be a Pastor, even getting a MA in Theology. But like you, I didn’t agree with alot of their theology.Curious (to me) question. But, cradle Catholic. I’d be the first in a very large Catholic family to leave. Two first cousins are priests and my father was a seminarian for many years. Grew up very involved in the Church (school, retreats, alter server, etc
This is great Will, but as you can see, submission of intellect and will does not equate to “Believing something I am not convinced of”. It just means …\I’m a source document guy and my questions that led to Canon 750-752 is some motivation for my post. These state I “must believe” and that a “submission of the intellect and will must be given“. As I mentioned above, believing something I’m not convinced of, is something I simply cannot do. I don’t see this as a choice…and hence my uncomfortableness with my current standing with the Church.
What seems to be the trouble, Will?not only am I not fulfilling my requirements, but I’m considered opposed to the Church.
Haha. Yes, I think it is.(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Yes, that’s the analogy. I’ve realized/determined/acknowledged my “lack of qualification” and am looking to disclose that fact.WillPhillips:![]()
I’m not familiar with qual card, but I guess you mean that if you discovered that you were not qualified (because something was missing), you would be required to disclose it to the appropriate authority.How about, being qualified, then realizing I’m missing some pages…and that my qual card isn’t actually completed.
Perhaps not trouble per se but more an acknowledgement of canon law, and coming to terms with my “opposition to the Church”WillPhillips:![]()
What seems to be the trouble, Will?not only am I not fulfilling my requirements, but I’m considered opposed to the Church.