E
EarthWanderer
Guest
Hello, I was at a confession a few days ago. There was one sin where I was not sure if it was venial, or grave. I did confess this sin as such. But then I wanted to add that if this was grave, I commited a separate (grave) sin of receiving the Eucharist while in the state of this grave sin.
What I wanted to say to the priest was something along the lines that I don’t know if I didn’t receive the latest Eucharist in the state of a grave sin (because of the sin I confessed a few moments ago) and that I’m not trying to excuse myself nor wanting to make it more serious than it potentially was. (My intent was to submit this “receiving Euchairst in the state of a grave sin” sin just like it happened, or didn’t happen.)
However when I started to say “I don’t know…”, the priest interrupted me and said that I should know if I committed a sin or not. I tried to explain that I know it was a sin, but that I’m not sure about its graveness (which would then either mean receiving the Eucharist in a grave sin, or not) and that I don’t want to belittle it.
But his interruption kind of derailed me and I’m not sure now if - based on what I actually said in reaction to his comments, rather that if I was allowed to say what I planned to say without interruptions - I actually sufficiently confessed/explained this particular sin or its circumstances.
As a result, in a way I actually feel worse after this “imperfect confession” than before it. As if I wanted to solve certain problems, but kept some and caused a different one. I understand that feelings are not always the decisive factor, but on the other hand I know how the joy or serenity feels like when I relieve my conscience in a good confession. In this case, my heart and brain are kind of confused. What (if anything) can I do about this? Let time heal it? Go to a new confession? Mention this at the next confession?
(In general, the priest seemed to be in a rush or something, saying “next” repeatedly when I confessed individual sins, not allowing to provide much background - for me, such an approach is not exactly comforting.)
Additional comments for context:
As for the (un)certainty about a grave sin, I understand some things (their graveness) are obvious and clear. But in some cases, it is more difficult for me to say whether the line was crossed or not. (Also keeping in mind the possibility of various levels of behaviour in the same matter.) To make it more complicated, on the one hand I know that if there are doubts about the graveness, it means no grave sin (and then I would be unsincere during a confession if saying it was definitely a grave sin). But on the other hand, what if these doubts come from the devil?
Many years ago, I was quite scrupulous and was able to go to confession every two days or so. I managed to get this under control, but on the other hand I’m now sometimes not sure if I cannot get a bit on the lax side.
Thank you for any helpful advices or comments.
What I wanted to say to the priest was something along the lines that I don’t know if I didn’t receive the latest Eucharist in the state of a grave sin (because of the sin I confessed a few moments ago) and that I’m not trying to excuse myself nor wanting to make it more serious than it potentially was. (My intent was to submit this “receiving Euchairst in the state of a grave sin” sin just like it happened, or didn’t happen.)
However when I started to say “I don’t know…”, the priest interrupted me and said that I should know if I committed a sin or not. I tried to explain that I know it was a sin, but that I’m not sure about its graveness (which would then either mean receiving the Eucharist in a grave sin, or not) and that I don’t want to belittle it.
But his interruption kind of derailed me and I’m not sure now if - based on what I actually said in reaction to his comments, rather that if I was allowed to say what I planned to say without interruptions - I actually sufficiently confessed/explained this particular sin or its circumstances.
As a result, in a way I actually feel worse after this “imperfect confession” than before it. As if I wanted to solve certain problems, but kept some and caused a different one. I understand that feelings are not always the decisive factor, but on the other hand I know how the joy or serenity feels like when I relieve my conscience in a good confession. In this case, my heart and brain are kind of confused. What (if anything) can I do about this? Let time heal it? Go to a new confession? Mention this at the next confession?
(In general, the priest seemed to be in a rush or something, saying “next” repeatedly when I confessed individual sins, not allowing to provide much background - for me, such an approach is not exactly comforting.)
Additional comments for context:
As for the (un)certainty about a grave sin, I understand some things (their graveness) are obvious and clear. But in some cases, it is more difficult for me to say whether the line was crossed or not. (Also keeping in mind the possibility of various levels of behaviour in the same matter.) To make it more complicated, on the one hand I know that if there are doubts about the graveness, it means no grave sin (and then I would be unsincere during a confession if saying it was definitely a grave sin). But on the other hand, what if these doubts come from the devil?
Many years ago, I was quite scrupulous and was able to go to confession every two days or so. I managed to get this under control, but on the other hand I’m now sometimes not sure if I cannot get a bit on the lax side.
Thank you for any helpful advices or comments.