F
fakename
Guest
Considering that I may’ve been wrongly late (but by only a 3-5 min), should I go to another mass?
For your information being able to receive Communion has nothing to do with when you arrive at Mass.As a general rule, if you are there in time for the reading of the gospel, you may recieve communion and going to another mass is not needed.
What do you mean by “wrongly late”? Were you careless or did you deliberately plan to arrive after the greeting and Confetior? If the latter, then you might have something to deal with. However, I doubt you could resolve it in time for another Mass on the same day.Considering that I may’ve been wrongly late (but by only a 3-5 min), should I go to another mass?
more like careless.What do you mean by “wrongly late”? Were you careless or did you deliberately plan to arrive after the greeting and Confetior? If the latter, then you might have something to deal with. However, I doubt you could resolve it in time for another Mass on the same day.
If you were there in time for the Gospel reading, then you should not have to attend another Mass. You should not leave before Communion.Considering that I may’ve been wrongly late (but by only a 3-5 min), should I go to another mass?
Interesting, I was told that the one should intend to be at the whole mass though…My Opus Dei spiritual director said that you are not late if you made it before the Apostles Creed.![]()
The Church states you must participate (attend) in the Mass but there are no documents to state that you must arrive by a certain time. Even pre-Vatican II there were no such documents.Interesting, I was told that the one should intend to be at the whole mass though…
And yet, if it was a sin to not attend the whole mass, then why the pre-Vatican II rules that one would not be vicious to not come early or even at the beginning?
I don’t quite understand your wording here. If it is a golden rule then it is obligatory but since it is not obligatory to arrive before the Apostle’s Creed then why is it called a golden rule.The Church states you must participate (attend) in the Mass but there are no documents to state that you must arrive by a certain time. Even pre-Vatican II there were no such documents.
Obviously it is disrespectful (but not a sin of grave matter) if you deliberately turn up after it has begun or are careless about time and regularly turn up after Mass has started…
The golden rule (unwritten) is that the priest should be last into Church and first out.
Via conscience formation and guidance of one’s priest.And if there are no standards for too late, then how can someone know when they are indeed too late?
These may be guidelins given to individuals by well-meaning priests, or by parents, but the Church has no such standards.What about the standards posted above?
I will answer this as though the question were posed to me by one of my confirmation students. I would suggest to them not to worry about whether they were late so much as I would suggest they concentrate on the virtue of dilligence. By always arriving at a minimum of 15 minutes early then one has time to pray and settle in without any worry about rules or such.I don’t quite understand your wording here. If it is a golden rule then it is obligatory but since it is not obligatory to arrive before the Apostle’s Creed then why is it called a golden rule.
It’s very confusing. And if there are no standards for too late, then how can someone know when they are indeed too late? What about the standards posted above?
If you are late to mass, wouldn’t that mean you did not fulfill the mass obligation? And so there is the importance of knowing what is late and what is not.The old rule was arrive by the Gospel, leave not before communion. This could (and did) lead to minimalism: what’s the least I can do to satisfy the rules. It’s not a very Christian attitude.
The modern rule is that the Mass is a complete liturgy, and you should make the effort to be there for the whole thing. Otherwise, we’d only need to have the minimum. However, being human, this will not always happen.
I think more important is to consider why you might be late, and whether you need to adjust your priorities.
Were you busy helping someone (act of charity) or unavoidably delayed–say, by a train stopped on the tracks? Did you wake up late? Did you intentionally miss the first few minutes? Is it a matter of habit, being late–and how do you handle it when it matters, such as being on time for work, for court, for meeting your boss? (Mass should matter more. Do what you need to do to be on time.) Is it a passive-aggressive protest?
As a priest, if I do not make it into the church in time to vest and join the full liturgy, I may not concelebrate–but I may take part in what I can.
So: should you attend another Mass? Well, why were you late? Does it matter enough to you that you feel you need to attend a full Mass? Is it a minor enough sin to ask God’s mercy and to learn from it in the future?
No, it does not necessarily maen that.If you are late to mass, wouldn’t that mean you did not fulfill the mass obligation?
Late = Mass has started and you are not thereAnd so there is the importance of knowing what is late and what is not.
well ok then.No, it does not necessarily maen that.
Late = Mass has started and you are not there
Late is any time after Mass begins, not at some point of arriving after the Mass has begun.
So, are you going to be early to mass this coming Sunday?If you are late to mass, wouldn’t that mean you did not fulfill the mass obligation? And so there is the importance of knowing what is late and what is not.
There is no rule.It’s been years now that a priest told me that the new rule was that you missed mass if you miss ANY of the readings.