If the problem doesn’t exist for funerals then that is great. We should expand that to the other areas as well. Parish registration is not in canon law.
Here, you will forgive me if I feel the need for a different sort of clarification.
Canon law is clear that, when it comes to someone who is dead, there is a maximum of solicitude on the one hand and the fewest possible obstacles are to be created on the other hand.
The deceased Catholic has a right to the funeral rites in their parish church or any church that they choose or their survivors choose for them; the parish in whose boundaries they died also has a canonical obligation in regard to the deceased. This is the solicitude of a mother for her child.
In all of this, I have a serious obligation as a priest, both before God and before the Church, in favour of the deceased person who, after all, can no longer comply with any request or any norm of law…they’re dead. We want to assure that they are buried, which needs to happen expeditiously, with all the rites and assistance of the Church.
On the other hand, relative to someone who is alive, I have obligations as a priest regarding canon law and particular law. Someone who is being baptised has to be prepared for the sacrament and is to receive follow-up pastoral care and attention. For these reasons, I should properly be baptising my own parishioners and not someone else’s parishioners and certainly not random people – unless they are on the verge of death, in which case they of course are to be ministered to without regard for parish or diocese.
Also, the place of baptism, because of the nature of our sacramental record system in the Catholic Church, will follow this person until death and so the person baptised needs to have some sort of real relationship with the parish and pastors are rightly admonished to be most attentive to issues of canonical jurisdiction.
Relative to the sacrament of marriage, I have an obligation to assure that both the groom and the bride are, in fact, free to marry, that at least one of them is Catholic (since I cannot marry two non-Catholics), that the Catholic party(ies) have completed the sacraments of initiation and are practicing the faith, and of course I must conduct the pre-marriage investigations prescribed by canon law.
The couple must also be suitably instructed and prepared by someone – and it should normally be the parish priest of at least of them who takes that responsibility. So, again, given the intensity involved, I can understand why a parish priest would not wish to do this for someone who is not and will not be a parishioner.
Americans are very efficient about parish registrations and I appreciate the advantages of doing this. In making my earlier comment about the absolute necessity of complying with the latitude canon law demands of me relative to the pastoral care for the remains of the dead, I do not thereby wish to imply that I am calling for – or tolerate in myself – laxity in what canon law and particular law demands relative to the pastoral care of and preparing of one’s own parishioners for the various sacraments or the provisions that call upon me to respect the authority of those who properly shepherd their own flock – which are, canonically speaking, not my flock.