J
JKirkLVNV
Guest
Catholic90:![]()
…
First you make a horribly crude comment regarding “preadolescents.” I’ll chalk that one up to defensiveness on your part because you obviously know that shorts don’t belong in the sanctuary.
Then you bring out the old “if we required that of them, then no one would serve.” Utter hubris – laughable hubris at that. When someone uses that excuse (usually in conjunction with female altar servers) I now wonder if they are aware just how foolish they appear?
Then you go into a diatribe (for unknown reasons) about sandals for which I have no comment.
You’re defensive because you know darn well you are attempting to defend an undefendible position. You’d better get used to more pressure because a great deal of the garbage long tolerated from the late 1960’s no longer receives special license from the laws of PCism and that is sure to enrage people like yourself.
The poster’s position is extremely defensible (not at all undefendible, which I’m not certain is a word). The Church has never prohibited anything as far as dress goes except what is immodest. Even if you regard shorts as immodest, simple logic and rational thought would dictate that in this instance, when the boys are wearing ROBES, it’s a moot point, ie, the robes cover the shorts. Once again, I think we should all be doing something else at Mass other than monitoring what other people are wearing, lest we start to sound like Gladys Kravitz on “Bewitched.”