G
GRATEFULONEjim
Guest
It is working extremely well in the Diocese of Buffalo.Yes, of course. And it is important to look at the entirety of the church’s teaching on a subject. In this case, it seems absolutely clear to me that the church does not teach that Confirmation is a sacrament for mature, well - catechized teens, even if that is the current discipline in some places. The entire Christian East, Catholic and Orthodox, gives the Sacrament of Chrismation (Confirmation), immediately following Baptism. Canon law for the western Church states that, in cases of danger of death, infants should be given Confirmation. Yes, it is so important that the church teaches that that we should not hold to the common discipline in danger of death. In many places, such as Mexico, Latin America and the Philippines, it is common (and licit) to confirm children as infants or toddlers. Canon law and the Catechism both state that confirmation should be given at about the age of discretion, but gives pretty wide leeway as to exceptions. How can it be clearer that the church does not require or desire a mature, adult faith in order to receive the sacrament? Yes, some Bishops might set a later age, and that is their right. I would be willing to bet, however, that none of those Bishops would argue that the sacrament is not licit and fruitful at an earlier age. They would mostly argue that their own pastoral situation calls for a later age, as a means to keep kids involved in classes longer, so as to not lose them entirely. I sympathize, but I’m not really sure it is working, anyway.