Should the United States go to war with Iran?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TEPO
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TEPO

Guest
I heard on the radio the other day (NPR), that Iran is now only one year away from becoming capable of building nuclear weapons. That’s 12 months!!!:eek:

Some days I wake up not wanting to have anything to do with middle-east affairs, considering their choices as their own business whether good or bad.

…but other days I wake up thinking that it would be too big of a risk having Iran as a nuclear power, considering that it is too great of a threat to the common good of the world.

In the end, I wonder if by going to war with Iran to stop them from having nuclear capabilities would save more human lives than allowing them to be able to use those kinds of weapons.
 
Honestly, this situation to me seems similar to allowing a mass knife murderer to buy a sub-machine gun and then not allowing the authorities to take it from him.

How can some justify the latter but not the former, which is really just the same situation on a much larger scale?

Personally, I’m not sure how this should be handled. 🤷
 
No.

We’re prepared if they attack us, but we went to war with Iraq which was wrong and sinful…we can’t make that mistake again.

The US had never thrown out the first blow before, I was ashamed of the leadership at that time. Worst of all, many of our soldiers were maimed or killed. Significantly, we’re financially in trouble.
 
In terms of military action, we (the US) need to sit this one out unless a very substantial part of the world really commits to help. And by “help”, I don’t mean some UN resolution authorizing the US to do something - I mean money and troops. And no nation-building: just go in, kill and destroy, and get out.

Let’s fact it; we’re broke, and we’re still trying to extricate ourselves from hard bogdowns in Afghanistan and Iraq. Let someone else deal with Iran.
 
The US has been the criminal instigator in several wars in the last few decades. The US government needs to get out of the habit of mass murder to achieve geopolitical position.
 
From a practical standpoint, it would seem that Iran would make a more valuable political and economic ally to the USA than either Saudi Arabia or Israel.
 
No.

We’re prepared if they attack us, but we went to war with Iraq which was wrong and sinful…we can’t make that mistake again.

The US had never thrown out the first blow before, I was ashamed of the leadership at that time. Worst of all, many of our soldiers were maimed or killed. Significantly, we’re financially in trouble.
Are you ashamed of our current leadership? Trying to push the CC around…using drones indiscriminately…pro gay marriage…etc…
 
No.

We’re prepared if they attack us, but we went to war with Iraq which was wrong and sinful…we can’t make that mistake again.

The US had never thrown out the first blow before, I was ashamed of the leadership at that time. Worst of all, many of our soldiers were maimed or killed. Significantly, we’re financially in trouble.
I wonder who invaded Kuwait (hint: It was not the US). The war in Iraq was an extention of Iraq’s invation of Kuwait. Maybe it is sinful to try to help others, even if they live in the Middle East or Europe (WW II).

Of course the leadership we have now has done nothing to be ashamed of, just trying get rid of the milatary and unborn children. 🙂 :gopray:
 
The US has been the criminal instigator in several wars in the last few decades. The US government needs to get out of the habit of mass murder to achieve geopolitical position.
Who killed more people, the US or Iraq? the:US or the old USSR? the US or Naze Germany? the US or mainland China? The only mass murder the US has been doing is the murder of it’s own unborn children. :eek: :gopray:
 
I heard on the radio the other day (NPR), that Iran is now only one year away from becoming capable of building nuclear weapons. That’s 12 months!!!:eek:

Some days I wake up not wanting to have anything to do with middle-east affairs, considering their choices as their own business whether good or bad.

…but other days I wake up thinking that it would be too big of a risk having Iran as a nuclear power, considering that it is too great of a threat to the common good of the world.

In the end, I wonder if by going to war with Iran to stop them from having nuclear capabilities would save more human lives than allowing them to be able to use those kinds of weapons.
To me, the focus should not be just one Iran. To me, the big nuclear-armed countries of the world (or at least some of them) need to come together and arrive at clear rule concerning new countries having, or having the capacity to have, weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

To me, the RULE should be this: No more countries may obtain WMDs or the technological capacity to develop WMD. Period. Also, little countries that already have WMDs must give them up. That means North Korea, Pakistan and Israel must surrender their nuclear weapons.

The CONSEQUENCE should be this: The big countries that already have WMDs will use all necessary force to de-WMD-ize any nation that refuses to comply with the above Rule. Necessary force could range from total economic isolation, to regime change, to total nuclear obliteration.

If little nations are allowed to get or keep nuclear bombs, sooner or later some person inside these governments will sell or give one of these bombs to bad guys, and these bad guys will use them to vaporize Washington, D.C., New York City, Los Angeles, Rome, etc.

So, we can either get serious now, or get serious later, after a world-altering tragedy has already happened.

This is all foreseeable.

The 9-11 attacks were totally foreseeable. Yet, our government sat on its hands and did not prepare for that possibility.

Several years before 9-11, the “X-Files” spin off “The Lone Gunmen” had an episode in which terrorist flew a jetliner into the World Trade Center in NYC. If Hollywood writers could foresee this, so could anyone else.

So, yet, we are going to have to move troops and ships into position to do a regime change in Iran. Maybe at the last minute they’ll surrender all their nuclear development site as a means to save their regime. But if not, then Iran will have a new government.

But we must not stop there. We must be sane and lay down the rule: No more nations can have WMDs, and little nations that already have them must surrender them. Period.
 
No. It would confirm that Zionists control the US. Which other ally but Israel is given such treatment?
 
Then how did Sadaam Hussein manage to kill so many Kurds? And wouldn’t military actions against the Kurds - which violated the peace agreement signed after the first Iraqi war - be seen the same as the invasion of Kuwait without the political boundaries?
 
Maybe is someone told that to Saddam Hissan before Kuwait (a small country compaired to Iraq) was invaded and if he believed that, Iraq would not have been invaded. Having a less then great military never stop a mad (or evil) man from invading another country. :):gopray:
 
Are you saying that we should not have gone against Nazi Germany? Did we force the Nazis to murder 12 million people in the death campies? Both the old USSR and mainland China have murder 100 million people each and China is still murdering it’s unborn children. Are you saying we forced the old USSR and China to murder their own people? :confused::gopray:
 
No. It would confirm that Zionists control the US. Which other ally but Israel is given such treatment?
When did the ‘Zionists’ take control of the US (considering Isreal did not become an ally of the US until the 1960’s)? :confused:🙂
 
When they received authority to issue the nation’s money, when a handful received control of almost all the media, when the US started toppling all enemies of Israel in the Middle East for a potpourri of weak and pathetic reasons.

What is disturbing is that the other enemies of the US are countries with no private central banks. It is almost like the US in a puppet for Zionist world dominance.
 
When they received authority to issue the nation’s money, when a handful received control of almost all the media, when the US started toppling all enemies of Israel in the Middle East for a potpourri of weak and pathetic reasons.

What is disturbing is that the other enemies of the US are countries with no private central banks. It is almost like the US in a puppet for Zionist world dominance.
I don’t appreciate using the word Zionist in this context, because its racist. I do believe that there is an ‘elitist’ group involved with the US, UK, and UN, but I don’t appreciate blaming the Jewish race. That’s ridiculous, isn’t it? Isn’t it clearly ridiculous…? :confused:

…isn’t it? 🤷
…yes it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top