E
ellammcg
Guest
What are those?Flip flops don’t belong in Mass either,but that beats those hideous hooker shoes.
What are those?Flip flops don’t belong in Mass either,but that beats those hideous hooker shoes.
I think the poster is referring to “High Heeled” women shoes. The heel looks like a spike. Which as far as I am concerned are very hard to walk in. …very uncomfortable for me.What are those?
This quote (from the above posted link)-Did anyone see this page at a parish website I put in a previous post? Kudos to the priest of THIS parish: stpaulparish.ca/how-we-dress-for-mass.php
We all have a mission to evangelize, and what better way is there than to make people aware of where we are heading on Sunday and how we feel about it? Without uttering a single word, our “Sunday Best” proclaims the good news.
…and maybe with glitter on them. Thats hooker-ish for sure.I think the poster is referring to “High Heeled” women shoes. The heel looks like a spike. Which as far as I am concerned are very hard to walk in. …very uncomfortable for me.
Fantastic!! When we do the right thing, God can use us for His purposes…reminded of an incident with may pastor and his wife. They were dressed up to go to church (Wednesday evening) and they stopped to eat at a fast food restaurant on their way to church. Their server asked why they were dressed up and they were able to witness to her and invite her to church…
usually platform high heels often with an ankle strap…think pole dancer.certainly not sold at Sears but at adult fantasy shops.they scream “loose morals”What are those?
I agree if people take their own discretion and learn on their on own what they should and should not wear chances are that most of the people in church will not figure it out, I also believe being modestly dressed shows you have even more respect for the church even before, during, and after mass. sure I was taught that certain types of clothing were for different types of occasions and I am not certainly judging anyone, I am just saying that I think it is time that the record be set straight,this day and age priest are more likely to speak of other matters, not a dress code, but I am sure some of you remember a time when only dress and long skirt were a allowed no pants of any kind. This also has to do with the kind of society in which we live.Your concern is PRECISELY the EXCUSE priests use to avoid taking definitive action. While it is true that attendance by ‘some’ may go down…so be it!!! That would only be a temporary reaction. The fact to the matter is that the REASON mass attendance is down now is because so many people find it ‘wanting’. Try going to a Latin mass and you can ‘feel’ the awesome respect of the attendees. I believe that once our priests take definitive action at our regular masses, attendance will sky-rocket because then people will truly ‘get something’ out of the experience! It is called sanctifying grace!!!
Popes SoldierGOOD !! If somebody’s Catholic faith is so weak that they would rather miss mass than dress decently, then I say don’t let the doorknob hit them on the way out.
Originally Posted by Popes Soldier
GOOD !! If somebody’s Catholic faith is so weak that they would rather miss mass than dress decently, then I say don’t let the doorknob hit them on the way out.
I suggest you re-read what I said. I did NOT say to kick anyone out, NOR did I say that certain people don’t have the right to attend Mass.Popes Soldier
As much as we want to kick everyone who walks through the front door of the church, that is not properly dressed, for fairness of everyone that has a right to attend mass should able to if they are able…
I cannot help but disagree with you. You seem to want to place the blame and/or responsibility on the people rather than the priests. The ‘people’ do not decide what is printed in the bulletin. That decision is the Pastor’s. The ‘people’ are not allowed to post signs in the vestibule of the church. That decision needs to be approved by the Pastor. ANY definitive action to counter the blatant immodest dress by ‘some’ people needs to be initiated or at least ‘approved’ by the Pastor. That is the way the ‘system’ is set up…therefore that is why the ‘burden’ is squarely on the shoulders of the Pastor!I agree if people take their own discretion and learn on their on own what they should and should not wear chances are that most of the people in church will not figure it out, I also believe being modestly dressed shows you have even more respect for the church even before, during, and after mass. sure I was taught that certain types of clothing were for different types of occasions and I am not certainly judging anyone, I am just saying that I think it is time that the record be set straight,this day and age priest are more likely to speak of other matters, not a dress code, but I am sure some of you remember a time when only dress and long skirt were a allowed no pants of any kind. This also has to do with the kind of society in which we live.
Sure if we see someone not dressed properly then we should not look but if they are in front of us how can we not, maybe it is not the place of the priest to say anything right now but chances are that if he gets tired of it he will pull the people aside away from everyone else and tell them that he thinks in respect for God and The Church they need to wear more modest clothing, it is bound to happen if it has not already.
Thank you so much for saying this. That sentiment has cropped up multiple times here, and it is extremely offensive.–the idea that anybody who actually tries to imply that there is an ‘appropriate’ style, behavior, or standard in a given situation is bigoted, intolerant, and hateful in that he/she is trying to ‘exalt themselves’ (usually over some ‘poor person’ who would NEVER be able to act, or dress, or behavior in 'such a way that is so outside their normal experience).
To which I say “Balderdash”. . . that last is actually a stereotyping of the poor that ‘assumes’ that the poor are incapable of ‘learning’ or ‘achieving’ anything themselves due to their being poor. Circular logic of the worst kind.
religioustolerance.org/rel_rate.htmTheir best estimates are that the percentage of adults who actually attended religious services during the previous weekend dropped from 42% in 1965 to 26% in 1994.
Actually, there were no need for codes then, because people had a little common sense on how to dress for church, and filthy excuses for “fashions” were not popular then.I will assume that dress “codes” (as far as modesty and such are concerned) were enforced more strictly in the 60’s than now…
How would I decide which of my clothes is my “sunday best”?Actually, there were no need for codes then, because people had a little common sense on how to dress for church, and filthy excuses for “fashions” were not popular then.
I have not heard the term “My Sunday Best” since I was a kid. My parents bought me “Sunday” clothes strictly for Sunday. Who does that now?
Well, if you can’t figure out what your Sunday Best is, why don’t you go buy some Sunday best !!! Then you’ll know. <>How would I decide which of my clothes is my “sunday best”?
What if my best shirt and my best pants don’t match? Do I still wear them together since they are my “sunday best”?
Does best mean most stylish, most expensive, most fashionable, best material, or the clothes that flatter me the most?