D
Deacon_Ed
Guest
The difference is your use of the word “never” which would seem to preclude any possiblity of coming to an reasonably full understanding of Scripture without a knowledge of Greek. I utterly reject such a position. I know many people who have a good working knowledge of Scripture but who know no Greek. May statement isn’t the same as yours at all. It states that a knowledge of Greek may enhance what we can know without Greek.It’s hard to see that yours differs significantly from my: " Yes, otherwise we’ll never fully understand the NT."
I don’t see yours as being “correct” as opposed to my allegedly “incorrect” option. They’re just two ways of saying the same thing. It’s just that mine’s a bit stronger.
Further, I’m not sure that even with a knowledge of Greek (and history, sociology, etc.) anyone can come to a “full understanding.” That would be like coming to a full understanding of the nature of God. It just isn’t possible because Scripture, like the Deposit of Faith, is infinitely deep.
Does that help to clarify why I didn’t think your poll contained the correct answer?
Deacon Ed