M
MrS
Guest
Maybe… but there are 20 posts, and nearly 300 “views”… so somebody is looking…Just to toss this out there, have you noticed none of those who we were debating with has followed us to this new thread?
Maybe… but there are 20 posts, and nearly 300 “views”… so somebody is looking…Just to toss this out there, have you noticed none of those who we were debating with has followed us to this new thread?
I just saw that one!! Reason and logic prevail:thumbsup:I’m sure some do, but probably not most… as guanophore pointed out also, I’m sure most don’t realize how the NT canon was formed either (but then again many Catholics probably don’t either)… This reminds me of the recent ‘Journey Home’ episode on EWTN, where the guy was a former Presbyterian seminarian who said the turning point for his change of heart was when he studied the history of the Bible and learned about the process of accepting a canon (realizing it took someone or something with authority to decide on those books and what they meant in order to include them).
SD
There is no single understanding of this phrase among non-Catholic Christians. There are many that would strongly disagree with your characterization of their beliefs.this is not what our separated brethren mean when they use this term. When they say “grace alone”, they mean that there is no obligation on the part of the person to respond, to accept, to engage in the works that the grace intends to produce.
Two key protestant slogans are “justification by grace alone” and “justification by faith alone.” … Catholics have never had trouble affirming the first slogan
Jimmy Akin, “The Salvation Controversy”, pg 132
The classic Catholic alternative to saying we are saved “by faith alone” is to say, “We are saved by faith, hope and charity.” It is possible, however, for these two formulas to be equivalent in meaning.
May the peace of Christ be with you.Jimmy Akin, “The Salvation Controversy”, pg 133
Somewhere St. Paul says something that sounds like all we need is faith.
Crumpy, it is important to distinguish between the “works” James taught about in James 2:24 and the “works of the law” Saint Paul taught about in Rom. 3:20,28; Gal. 2:16,21; 3:2,5,10; and Eph. 2:8-9. Protestants generally confuse James’ “good works” from Paul’s “works of the law” when they attempt to prove that “works” are irrelevant to justification and salvation. The “works of the law” Paul taught about in Ephesians 2:8-9 and elsewhere referred to the Mosaic law and their legal system that made God obligated to reward them for their works.
They always try to use this quote.
I don’t think this is necessarily true. I think that God has many works that He has prepared from eternity, that we should walk in them. Many of us “miss” opportunities. His grace still covers us. Think about many of the saints, beginning with St. Paul the Apostle. God did not intend that he should persecute the Church. God stopped him in his tracks. Paul, because of his preconceived notions about 'messiah", did not accept the gospel when he heard it. Instead, he held the cloaks of those who stoned Stephen. He failed to do many “God willed works” prior to his conversion, as we all have. This does not mean we will go to hell.Protestants also have no concept of what happens to a person who refuses to do a “God willed work” and then dies.
The answer is Hell.
There is a discussion of this in the Knights of Columbus Luke E. Hart Series, What Catholics Believe, Section 1: Faith, written by Peter Kreeft. Check out paragraph 14:Somewhere St. Paul says something that sounds like all we need is faith.