Showdown: 4,000 families threaten to leave Toronto Catholic schools over gay equity policy

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Abyssinia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can understand it and accept it, even agree with it, in a secular institution, but not a private institution, and not when it goes against the teachings of the base institution, in this case the Catholic Church’s teachings QUOTE]

:confused:
If there is a group that can help students better understand themselves and a new way to live life away from frear and loneliness, why not? Isn’t it time that the chruch community step out of their comfort zone and embrace people from every walk of life and teach them why we beleive what we believe? If there was a support group for gays or teen parents, that would be begining of something that is much needed in our church. The church few things like you mentioned, but then why do we allow unmarried parents to send their paretns to private school? Or attend mass? Why do we baptize children from single teen parents? I alwasy felt that it was out of love that we did this. It shouldn’t matter how uncomfortable it makes us or the fear of our children being exposed to the world. Why shelter our kids and have them in a fantasy land through childhood for the sake of avoiding exposure? Humans are not perfect, even saints had a past. Seriously though WWJD? If he had the opportunity to such a diverse group of students all learning and coming closer to him, where is the bad in that? Again I feel it’s just the fact that people are uncomfortable and scared, and as long as parents are unwilling to “expose,” their kids and teach them how to love, but understand what their faith tells them, we’re never going to move forward and come closer together …

“Each one of them is Jesus in disguise.”
Mother Teresa
 
Rence;8229239:
I can understand it and accept it, even agree with it, in a secular institution, but not a private institution, and not when it goes against the teachings of the base institution, in this case the Catholic Church’s teachings
:confused:
If there is a group that can help students better understand themselves and a new way to live life away from frear and loneliness, why not?
My previous post explained why not :confused:
Isn’t it time that the chruch community step out of their comfort zone and embrace people from every walk of life and teach them why we beleive what we believe?
No, because they won’t be allowed to teach them what we believe. The truth of the matter is, the Catholic Church forbids homosexual relations, and to say so is often charged as discrimination. People lose their jobs for saying such ‘politically incorrect’ things. And while I’m not too concerned about that in a secular arena, I don’t think it’s tolerable in a private situation, such as a Catholic school, whose main objective is to TEACH Catholic Church teachings. A Catholic school is responsible for teaching what the Catholic Church teaches, regardless of whether the teaching is popular or not, or politically correct or not. It’s not a public school. It’s a private school. They are required to fulfill that objective or they should not be called Catholic. If my child attended a Catholic school that did not teach what is taught by the Church, I would pull them out of that school. Catholic parents don’t scrape up money to send their kids to Catholic schools (instead of sending them to public school for free) to have their children not learn what the Church teaches.
If there was a support group for gays or teen parents, that would be begining of something that is much needed in our church. The church few things like you mentioned, but then why do we allow unmarried parents to send their paretns to private school? Or attend mass? Why do we baptize children from single teen parents? I alwasy felt that it was out of love that we did this.
First of all, unmarried parents are not “allowed” to attend Mass, they are required to attend Mass. Being in a state of separation from the Church (or being excommunicated) means one is still Catcholi, but can’t have the Eucharist, or Communion). They are still responsible for carrying out their Catholic duties, including attending Mass. If they are in a state of mortal sin, they need to not receive Communion, or go to confession first. Second of all, unmarried parents are assumed to have commited the sin of fornication (which led to an unmarried pregnancy) in the past, and their life as an unmarried parent is not assumed to be an ongoing sin, unless otherwise stated by them, or proven otherwise. They are still Catholic and are called to fulful Catholic obligations, and live their lives as Catholics within the confines of the teachings of the Church. They are REQUIRED by the Church, not “allowed”, to raise their children Catholic, and when they have agreed to do so, with counsel of the priest, then their child is Baptized.

We baptize children from single teen parents because they have agreed to raise their children Catholic. If they don’t agree to raise their child Catholic, a good priest won’t Baptize any child, regardless if the parent is single or married. It’s not a sin to be a single teen parent. The sin was fornication, which we are to assume happened once, unless otherwise proven. Once the sin that made a single teen a parent is over, it’s over. Life goes on, and they are expected to move forward - in communion with the Church.

It is out of love that we “allow” single teen parents to attend Mass and Baptize their children. But we don’t “allow” these things to embrace the sins of the past, but to Catechize the single teen parent and their child, and make them better Catholics. They are expected to move forward, not wallow in a nest of sin forever.
It shouldn’t matter how uncomfortable it makes us or the fear of our children being exposed to the world. Why shelter our kids and have them in a fantasy land through childhood for the sake of avoiding exposure?
It’s not a matter of sheltering kids in regards to what the Church forbids. A Catholic school is already supposed to cover as part of their theology class the fact that homosexual orientation is acceptable, but a homosexual lifestyle is forbidden. That’s already supposed to be taught in a Catholic school - which again, is responsible for teaching Catholic theology, not what is politically correct. It’s not a secular school, it’s a private school whose policies and mission statement attest to it’s affiliation with the Church. In that regard, children attending Catholic schools are exposed to the knowledge from the perspective of the Church. What a ‘gay club’ will do, is set apart a group of students, and desensitize the kids, making it ‘not a big deal anymore’. And it is a big deal, just as much as premarital sex or ABCs.
Humans are not perfect, even saints had a past. Seriously though WWJD? If he had the opportunity to such a diverse group of students all learning and coming closer to him, where is the bad in that?
Jesus never put together support groups for his followers. They were all under his teaching…he didn’t have a separate groups for women, men, children, married, unmarried, prostitutes, tax collecters, etc. They all assembled together and he taught them all.
 
Again I feel it’s just the fact that people are uncomfortable and scared, and as long as parents are unwilling to “expose,” their kids and teach them how to love, but understand what their faith tells them, we’re never going to move forward and come closer together …
I realize you think that people are uncomfortable and scared, but I am not 🙂 I was born and raised in a well integrated area and was quite frequently in the company of gay people, gay couples, gay parents, etc. That’s probably why I have no issues with gay rights in the secular arena. However, I want my children to learn the rules of the Church as they apply to Church teachings. If I send my children to Catholic School, I expect them to deliver what they are called to offer. I expect them to live up to their policies and their mission statement. It is inappropriate for a Catholic school to have a gay club, just as it would have a ‘teenage mommies’ club, or a ‘teens on ABCs’ club. What the Church teaches about these issues should be part of the curriculum. While the school should definitely counsel and guide the children to continue to grow in knowledge and faith in the Church, no matter what mistakes they have made on the way, they don’t need a club for those who are not following Church teachings.
 
But the point you are missing with respect to this story is that the Toronto District Catholic School Board is not a private institution. It is fully funded by public money and therefore is obliged to follow the rules imposed by the Ministry of Education. The same does not apply to all other faith based schools because they are private institutions.
I did miss that point. I thought this was regarding Catholic schools. The Toronto District Catholic School board would be right if they were talking about Catholic schools only. If they are talking about all schools across the board, the secular ones, then I agree with you completely.
 
But the point you are missing with respect to this story is that the Toronto District Catholic School Board is not a private institution. It is fully funded by public money and therefore is obliged to follow the rules imposed by the Ministry of Education. The same does not apply to all other faith based schools because they are private institutions.
Rosepierre, unless I’m still not understanding, this movement is regarding Catholic schools in the area. Here is what the letter says, and all those caps are not mine. I just copy/pasted:
I FATHER JEREMIAH ATTAALLA ON BEHALF OF THE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHURCHES IN THE TORONTO AND GTA DISTRICT AREA
1 -ST MARK (SCARBOROUGH)
2 -ST GEORGE AND ST RUIESS (NORTH YORK)
3 -ST MOURICE AND ST VERENA (NORTH YORK)
4 -TI AGIA MARIA
AND ST DEMIANA (ETOBICOKE)
ALL THESE CHURCHES HAVE A POPULATION OF AT LEAST 5000 FAMILIES ATTENDING WITH TWELVE PRIESTS SERVING THOSE CHURCHES, AND I WOULD SAY THERE IS AT LEAST 80% OF THOSE FAMILIES WHO HAVE THEIR CHILDREN ATTENDING CATHOLIC SCHOOLS IF NOT THE REST ARE IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS.
NOT ONE OF THOSE FAMILIES SUPPORT THE PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD BECAUSE OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE (EIE) POLICY, THEREFORE IF THIS POLICY IS IMPLEMENTED AT LAST TO BE RECOGNIZED IN THE TORONTO CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD EVEN SURROUNDINGS IN WHICH WE HAVE LARGER NUMBER OF FAMILIES AS (MISSISSAUGA WITH OVER 7000 FAMILIES)
WE WILL NOT HESITATE TO WITHDRAW OUR CHILDREN AT ONCE FROM ATTENDING ANY CATHOLIC SCHOOL WITHIN TORONTO OR GTA IF THE REQUESTED AMENDMENTS ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED AND APPLIED TO THE EQUITY & INCLUSIVE EDUCATION POLICY AS THE AMENDMENTS ARE FAITHFUL TO THE TEACHINGS OF THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND CO-OPERATION.
 
Rosepierre, unless I’m still not understanding, this movement is regarding Catholic schools in the area. Here is what the letter says, and all those caps are not mine. I just copy/pasted:
It’s regarding publicly funded Catholic schools. I think probably most of the Catholic schools in Ontario are publicly funded…
 
It’s regarding publicly funded Catholic schools. I think probably most of the Catholic schools in Ontario are publicly funded…
Then it looks like they better do more fund raising and stop taking public funds. They never do come free.
 
Catholic schools are guaranteed by the British North America Act(Two founding nations-English and French) but that does not give Caesar the right to undermine Catholic Teaching to already horribly catechised Catholic children.
The author of this obscenity is our CINO,Liberal premier Dolton McGuinty or premier Dad who is about to be turfed from power this October.Catholic schools will NOT be implementing this particular homosexualist Trojan Horse which will be used to subvert Catholicism and proselytize impressionable minds.

He floated this one to make it an election issue but the Conservatives ain’t biting.We will repair the damage this final bastion of morally bankrupt and fiscally irresponsible liberalism has foisted upon us.A great wave of conservatism has swept over Canada in part due to the horror we see happening under the Democrats.Your loss-our gain.Get better-SOON.
 
Perhaps it doesn’t warrant saying anything yet from the higher echelon in the Church but; I’m surprised His Grace, Archbishop Thomas Collins of the Archdiocese of Toronto has made a statement yet.

Even; His Eminence Aloysius Cardinal Ambrozic Archbishop Emeritus of Toronto might have gave voiced opinions concerning this story.

At any rate I agree with most everybody else 👍
The Bishops wisely will not give the CINO McGuinty the fodder he needs to appeal to the Faith hating secularists to save his electoral butt in October.

The Conservatives were winning the last provincial election until the hapless and naive John Tory provided McFly with the ammo he needed to win the election by cynically appealing to the secularists.John Tory ill advisedly let slip the fact that he intended to authorize a voucher system to ALL Faiths which McGuinty exploited out of endemic pavlovian fear of Islam(Ours are quite tame-non wahabi and usually upper middle class suburban teenage Jahidists who are so infiltrarted as to be laughable)

He is even trying to make an issue out of abortion-challenger Hudak is pro-life but abortion is a federal matter and this cynical premier is just fearmongering.Ontario politics are slimy and with a newspaper like the Red Star,the Communist Broadcasting Commission and most Canadian MSM acting as mouthpieces for anything liberal conservatives must pick their battles and once the election is won there will be a bloodletting of entrenched liberalism just like there was federally and in the formerly Pinko Palace known as Toronto.The inner city elites STILL can’t quite comprehend the suburban truck that hit them called Ford Nation.Hopefully it will be a complete conservative hat trick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top