Shroud of turin -

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fatima-Crusader
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fatima-Crusader

Guest
In the shroud of turin the nails are in the palm, but in the gosepls Thomas is told to put his fingers in Christs hand. Does this prove it fake?
 
Last edited:
Wouldnt it need to come out the wrist, because its told none of His bones where broken
 
The 1st century word for hand includes the wrist.
The fact that the data that we see on the Shroud does not conform to 14th century popular idea is actually more of an indication that the Shroud is authentic.
The British Museum’s dating of the Shroud to the 14th century has been debunked. The latest dating studies give a date of 35 B.C.E. +/- 250 years.**

**THE SHROUD OF TURIN; FIRST CENTURY AFTER CHRIST!, Fanti/Malfi, 2015
(A new edition is due out soon.)
 
Last edited:
Who told you this? All attempts to prove that it is fake have failed for various reasons - mostly centering on the patched area. It has been preserved at both personal risk and cost for 2,000 years. There must be a reason for that.
 
Make what you will of the shroud, maybe it’s a miracle maybe it’s not as I’m inclined to believe. Just don’t base your faith on miracles like this being true or feel you have to convince everyone of that possibility. I can stand shoulder to shoulder with you by seeing the faith of people who traveled weeks and months to see it and other artifacts. They have an importance all their own simply by their own physical existence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top