More:Sidney Powell claims there are 450,000 ballots that voted only for Biden, left the rest blank
Celine Ryan
Washington, D.C.
November 8, 2020 2:33 PM
Attorney Sidney Powell claims that her team has found 450,000 ballots with only votes for Biden and no down-ballot selections made. Powell suggests that this number of single vote ballots is suspect, and indicative in part of “abject fraud” that she says flipped the election to Biden.
Powell is the attorney for Michael Flynn and has been vocal about the need to challenge the results of the General Election, which she contends is rife with evidence of a “massive and coordinated effort to steal this election,” by efforts to “delegitimize and destroy votes for Donald Trump, to manufacture votes for Joe Biden”
“They have done it in every way imaginable, from having dead people vote in massive numbers, to absolutely fraudulently creating ballots that exist only voting for Biden,” Powell told Fox’s Maria Bartiromo. We’ve identified identified at least 450,000 ballots in the key states that miraculously only have a mark for Joe Biden and no other candidate."
No they do not sign directly but when they show their ID, they state who they are and that they are entitled to their one vote. This is done in person so we know for sure that this person is indeed a live US citizen.No one signs the ballot. In the USA, your actual vote is between you and your Maker. No one has the right to know how you voted unless you choose to broadcast your vote.
And that is what insures that people can actually vote for who they want to vote for, not who their boss or neighbor or spouse or party want them to vote for.
The story says this person claims to have posted that as a joke and was never a ballot worker.Then this and other stories out there, just posting, not saying if this story is solid:
Let her prove it. If she can’t prove it, well…I have heard about this. It might be legit but this is part of this strange scenario.
There are no votes for others, this might explain some of the discrepancies say, with that one Senate case and yes, I know it might be, probably is legal. We will see what might develop.
Seriously? Do you really think that, with a Democrat and a Republican watching, a poll worker can throw out thousands of ballots? Do you know how many garbage bags that is? If she is referring to simply not counting them, the process doesn’t allow that. The spoiled ballots are checked by poll watchers.Then this and other stories out there, just posting, not saying if this story is solid:
So, there may be more this year. Why? Simple. This year’s presidential election brought in more people than the history of the United States, and the greatest percentage turn out in over a century. That means, there are those that came in to vote in the presidential race that do not normally vote in any race.Sidney Powell “discovers” common aspect of all U.S. presidential elections.
No one is concerned about absentee ballots that have been sent to the military.You are aware that absentee ballots have been a thing for a really long long time, aren’t you? People overseas, in the armed services, in hospitals, etc have been using them in every state of the union for decades.
That is not true. My license has to be updated every four years so it does look like I look currently. Also to get that license in New England I had to show three forms of ID - birth certificate, marriage certificate, and lastly, a notarized letter from my town saying I do live where I live. To get the notarized letter I had to prove this to my town by showing tax bills, an electric bill and the third piece of mail with my name and address on them…You are also aware that ID made many years ago may not match what you look like now. Weight gain/loss, additional wrinkles, clairol, glasses, masks, etc, all could make your old picture look different than what you look like now.
Signatures also change. My signature at 18 looked a whole lot different than it does not at 64.
Biometrics you say. Well fingerprints might work. But most of us didn’t have fingerprints taken when we were born so you can’t match the initial birth certificate to old people. People’s eyes change (lasix, blood sugar levels, etc) so all those lovely eye scans might not be as accurate as tv and movies suggest.
So, what is your 100% foolproof, absolute, will never be wrong methodology that these states can follow.
Credibility doesn’t seem to be a factor for everyone.This isn’t credible.
Sadly, this seems to be true.Credibility doesn’t seem to be a factor for everyone.
Why would I wear a mask while having my picture taken. I was required to take off sunglasses so I would imagine glasses are out unless you use them all the time. The picture on my license is only my face not body and it is pretty accurate.Have you changed your hairstyle in the last four years? Did you wear a mask when you had your picture taken? Did you change your hair color? Did you wear glasses for one and not the other? Did you gain way too much weight like some of us in the last few months? (Were you honest about your weight?)
Also, what state is New England. I missed that state in my 4th grade class.
undervote
Occurs when a voter doesn’t vote for every office on the ballot.
That is not the way it is in my state.That is not true. My license has to be updated every four years so it does look like I look currently. Also to get that license in New England I had to show three forms of ID - birth certificate, marriage certificate, and lastly, a notarized letter from my town saying I do live where I live. To get the notarized letter I had to prove this to my town by showing tax bills, an electric bill and the third piece of mail with my name and address on them…