OK, so I’ve had a few issues with the way a few things are done in my new parish… using glassware and earthenware for chalices, etc. But because we had a visiting priest this past Sunday (our pastor was in Detroit) one of the things that ‘bothers’ me also seemed to greatly disturb our ‘replacement’ priest…
…it seems that, long before I began attending the parish, the Liturgical Committee decided to ‘move’ the Sign of Peace from the Communion Rite to directly after the Gloria. OK… but the thing is, the Sign of Peace is, in our parish, an extended 15 minute (at least) house party. Last Sunday, after about 10 minutes, the visiting priest tried tap-tap-tapping on the microphone to let folks know that it was time to get back to business… but, of course, his tapping couldn’t be heard above the clamor. He was embarrassed, perhaps a little angry and I was really embarrassed for our parish.
In the instance of the glass and earthenware ‘chalices,’ I wrote to our pastor but the issue persists - only rarely do we have a noble metal chalice. I don’t know that this moved, extended ‘greeting’ is liturgical abuse or not so I have not written Father about it nor have I decided whether or not to tell him how frustrated the whole thing made our visiting priest (who is his very good friend, I understand).
So I’ve two questions:
- Does the movement of the Sign of Peace in the Order of the Mass constitute liturgical abuse?
- Should I send off another letter to our pastor, quoting the GIRM in re the Sign of Peace: "…it is appropriate that each person, in a sober manner, offer the sign of peace only to those who are nearest” and reminding him that the Sign is optional for the congregation and really shouldn’t be turned into a social hour (we DO have coffee and doughnuts after Mass, should those wanting to socialize wish to stick around).
Thoughts, comments and answers, please?
Thanks,
Clinton