Sign of Peace

  • Thread starter Thread starter aj830
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
MrS:
The may have to wait a bit… until some of the Mass attendees are through with their additional prayers after Mass. Our parish has a number of families who stay after Mass in quite prayer. It would be a sham, I mean shame, if they missed out on the fellowship in the parish hall.:whacky:
How is it that these families can achieve quiet prayer after Mass? Our church erupts into a not so dull roar the moment dismissal is over. Our Tabernacle is in a small chapel off to the side, and even with the doors closed, I have often felt tempted to wear earplugs, so I can silently talk to God over the uproar in the main Church.
 
40.png
paramedicgirl:
How is it that these families can achieve quiet prayer after Mass? Our church erupts into a not so dull roar the moment dismissal is over. Our Tabernacle is in a small chapel off to the side, and even with the doors closed, I have often felt tempted to wear earplugs, so I can silently talk to God over the uproar in the main Church.
I understand, and that is the case with us too. But some families put up with it. When the weather is decent, the noise goes outside. But with winter coming (here already), and with no narthex, … well, it remains to be seen if there is a “sign of any peace” after Mass.

Yesterday, there was no exit hymn, and total silence after Mass… at the pastor’s request. Instead, the church bells were tolled once in remembrance for each parishioner who has died this past year, and this will repeat each Sunday during November.
 
Wow, I guess I didn’t realize how lucky we are in our parish. We live in cold weather, have a very small entrance area to the church, and our Hall isn’t open immediately after Mass, but we still have relative quiet after Mass. It’s not perfect and some days are noisier than others, but if I’ve wanted to pray quietly after Mass, I’ve never found it to be so distracting that I’ve been unable to shut it out.

I guess I need to know when to count my blessings! 🙂

CARose
 
40.png
Orionthehunter:
I stand corrected as the Pax brede was an innovation of the Middle Ages away from teh traditional Kiss of Peace. However, this tradition died out and the church returned to the Kiss of Peace. This url gives some history on it. newadvent.org/cathen/08663a.htm

Regarding Bombay’s questioning whether it is true or not that the Kiss of Peace was at one time something expressed to people throughout the Church, I know it to be true. I don’t recall the book I was reading but it included a section about the how and why pews and kneelers were introduced into the Church. With the introduction of pews, there was a reform of the Sign of Peace to include only those in your immediate vicinity. Here were some things that actually happened in the early church.

During the offeratory, sheep, pigs, hogs and produce were actually brought up to the Priest as an offering. This is why we have the tradition of the Priest washing his hands prior to the consecration. The author also asserted that because of this reason, the tradition of women wearing gloves to Mass orginated.
Dude, you’re a hunter. Can’t you hunt down a link or two?

You forgot to mention the reason we use incense was to cover the smell of the serfs who only bathed once a year.

And Latin was used to keep the ignorant common folk from understanding the prayers of the Mass.
 
40.png
paramedicgirl:
And, most importantly, because it happens right after the consecration, it takes the focus off Jesus. I say ditch the sign of peace, and start focusing on the Real Presence.
Amazingly, in all those other liturgies that have touted, the peace exchange is NOT immediately after the consecration. It’s either way in the beginning, or BEFORE the Liturgy of the Eucharist starts.

I am rather fond of the good Dr. Bombay’s donut idea, though…
 
Dr. Bombay:
Dude, you’re a hunter. Can’t you hunt down a link or two?

You forgot to mention the reason we use incense was to cover the smell of the serfs who only bathed once a year.

And Latin was used to keep the ignorant common folk from understanding the prayers of the Mass.
I don’t know if this is meant joking or sarcastic. Anyway, Dr., if I were to take the time to find the book and the reference to which I refer on these issues, would you really change your mind? I’ve read a number of your posts and you have a definite preference for a vertical Mass from beginning to end.

To me, that makes Mass a private devotion conducted in union with other attendees. I for one think that the current practice of starting horizontally and gradually moving vertical with the culmination of the Mass being totally the Eucharist and the ending with a call to look horizontal as we go forth to live and spread the Good News makes the Mass beautiful and complete and true public worship.

As laity, we are called to first bring ourselves fully body, mind and soul to Mass to completely experience Christ through the Priest as celebrant, through the Living Word in the Gospel and Homily, through our fellow worshippers in the Confiteor and Sign of Peace and finally in His preeminent Presence in the Eucharist. To water down any of these experiences diminishes the effectiveness of the Mass and the Graces we obtain when we come to Mass.
 
40.png
OutinChgoburbs:
Amazingly, in all those other liturgies that have touted, the peace exchange is NOT immediately after the consecration. It’s either way in the beginning, or BEFORE the Liturgy of the Eucharist starts.

I am rather fond of the good Dr. Bombay’s donut idea, though…
And in each of those liturgies, the sign of peace is performed in way that would not detract from the presence of Christ on the altar, were it to be performed in a similar manner in the Latin rite.

When the sign of peace was performed by the Latin church in the early centuries after it had been transferred to its place after the Canon, I doubt that it detracted them from Christ’s presence. Why? They knew how to do it respectfully.
 
40.png
Orionthehunter:
I don’t know if this is meant joking or sarcastic. Anyway, Dr., if I were to take the time to find the book and the reference to which I refer on these issues, would you really change your mind? I’ve read a number of your posts and you have a definite preference for a vertical Mass from beginning to end.

To me, that makes Mass a private devotion conducted in union with other attendees. I for one think that the current practice of starting horizontally and gradually moving vertical with the culmination of the Mass being totally the Eucharist and the ending with a call to look horizontal as we go forth to live and spread the Good News makes the Mass beautiful and complete and true public worship.

As laity, we are called to first bring ourselves fully body, mind and soul to Mass to completely experience Christ through the Priest as celebrant, through the Living Word in the Gospel and Homily, through our fellow worshippers in the Confiteor and Sign of Peace and finally in His preeminent Presence in the Eucharist. To water down any of these experiences diminishes the effectiveness of the Mass and the Graces we obtain when we come to Mass.
I’m not sure about that diminishing Graces thing, Orion. Sounds a little sketchy to me theologically. Are you saying when a priest chooses the legitimate option of dropping the Sign of Peace, there is less Grace received at that Mass???

Reminds me of a couple of months ago I was watching daily Mass on EWTN and they had a visiting priest. He included the Sign of Peace, which is never done on EWTN. I think he just forgot. Anyway, I thought Fr. Angelus, who was concelebrating, was going to faint. Quite amusing. :rotfl:Wouldn’t have been so funny if I had been there, though.
 
Dr. Bombay:
I’m not sure about that diminishing Graces thing, Orion. Sounds a little sketchy to me theologically. Are you saying when a priest chooses the legitimate option of dropping the Sign of Peace, there is less Grace received at that Mass???

Reminds me of a couple of months ago I was watching daily Mass on EWTN and they had a visiting priest. He included the Sign of Peace, which is never done on EWTN. I think he just forgot. Anyway, I thought Fr. Angelus, who was concelebrating, was going to faint. Quite amusing. :rotfl:Wouldn’t have been so funny if I had been there, though.
Yes, I believe that if the Sign of Peacer were dropped it would diminish our ability to experience Christ through our fellow worshippers. The Sign of Peace has been part of Mass since the earliest Masses. It is a sign in which we express personally our unity with our fellow worshippers, that we forgive them for their sins (we don’t absolve just to be clear).

Regarding not being done on ESPN, it is also not done on our diocesan Sunday televised Mass. I’m sure there is an instruction regarding this as TV Mass has a different “environment” than public worship at a church.

Could you please show me where it is a legitimate option for a Priest to drop it (TV Mass notwithstanding)? I hope this isn’t another example of liturgical abuse.
 
40.png
Orionthehunter:
Could you please show me where it is a legitimate option for a Priest to drop it (TV Mass notwithstanding)? I hope this isn’t another example of liturgical abuse.
The actual wording is: : "Then the deacon (or the priest) may add: Let us offer each other the sign of peace." (Note “may” does not mean it is required) (GIRM 112)

(sorry about the bold)
 
40.png
Orionthehunter:
Yes, I believe that if the Sign of Peacer were dropped it would diminish our ability to experience Christ through our fellow worshippers. The Sign of Peace has been part of Mass since the earliest Masses. It is a sign in which we express personally our unity with our fellow worshippers, that we forgive them for their sins (we don’t absolve just to be clear).

Regarding not being done on ESPN, it is also not done on our diocesan Sunday televised Mass. I’m sure there is an instruction regarding this as TV Mass has a different “environment” than public worship at a church.

Could you please show me where it is a legitimate option for a Priest to drop it (TV Mass notwithstanding)? I hope this isn’t another example of liturgical abuse.
I have been giving this a lot of thought, and at first I believed that the sign of peace could be dropped and I wouldn’t have a problem with that…until I read this post… Mass is not a private devotion, we are there with our fellow catholics. We are to be united as one. If the Lord has asked us to forgive one another before we offer our sacrifice, the sign of peace is a perfect conveance of that. Let me explain. I sat down before mass last Sunday with my mother, and along comes this woman that occassionally sits in front of us, you know the type, doesn’t genuflect before entering the pew, is chewing gum when they enter, looking around to see who is in the church, has enough perfume on to choke half the congregation…I think you get my drift. She continuously talks to her husband, is looking over her shoulder during the homily, even during the consecration she is at it. I was so upset with her that she was such a distraction, I actually let out two huge sighs in church and then stopped myself from doing it a third time. All I could think was " I’m going to stop them after church and ask them if they know how distracting they are to everyone around them!!! I bring myself back into focus to hear… Lord Jesus Christ, you said to your apostles:
I leave you peace my peace I give you, Look not on our sins but on the faith of your church…Honest I almost started to giggle out loud. There it was, I knew at that second that I was going to have to shake her hand and forgive her for all her distractions, and in return she would forgive me for thinking about smacking her in the back of the head. Leave it behind before you come to the altar. The sign of peace is there for a reason and I will believe nothing else but that my Lord taught me a very valuable lesson in that pew on Sunday. You are wrong, wrong,wrong if you think it distracts from the real presence. Nothing in the world could have been more real than Christs presence in the pew with me at that moment. Wow that felt good. Praise God!!!
 
40.png
maryj:
I have been giving this a lot of thought, and at first I believed that the sign of peace could be dropped and I wouldn’t have a problem with that…until I read this post… Mass is not a private devotion, we are there with our fellow catholics. We are to be united as one. If the Lord has asked us to forgive one another before we offer our sacrifice, the sign of peace is a perfect conveance of that. Let me explain. I sat down before mass last Sunday with my mother, and along comes this woman that occassionally sits in front of us, you know the type, doesn’t genuflect before entering the pew, is chewing gum when they enter, looking around to see who is in the church, has enough perfume on to choke half the congregation…I think you get my drift. She continuously talks to her husband, is looking over her shoulder during the homily, even during the consecration she is at it. I was so upset with her that she was such a distraction, I actually let out two huge sighs in church and then stopped myself from doing it a third time. All I could think was " I’m going to stop them after church and ask them if they know how distracting they are to everyone around them!!! I bring myself back into focus to hear… Lord Jesus Christ, you said to your apostles:
I leave you peace my peace I give you, Look not on our sins but on the faith of your church….Honest I almost started to giggle out loud. There it was, I knew at that second that I was going to have to shake her hand and forgive her for all her distractions, and in return she would forgive me for thinking about smacking her in the back of the head. Leave it behind before you come to the altar. The sign of peace is there for a reason and I will believe nothing else but that my Lord taught me a very valuable lesson in that pew on Sunday. **You are wrong, wrong,wrong if you think it distracts from the real presence. **Nothing in the world could have been more real than Christs presence in the pew with me at that moment. Wow that felt good. Praise God!!!
I guess I should be happy for you… but actually I am puzzled.

For all these admitted distractions, you seem to then have accepted a new version of the real presence. If nothing in the world could have been more real, … did you go to communion and receive the Real Real Presence?

Approximately 60 years after Luther wrote his 95 complaints, there was a book published called 200 Versions of the Real Presence (or something close to that title)… I wondered how anyone could ever think of more than one… now you have helped me see how.
 
40.png
maryj:
I sat down before mass last Sunday with my mother, and along comes this woman that occassionally sits in front of us, you know the type, doesn’t genuflect before entering the pew, is chewing gum when they enter, looking around to see who is in the church, has enough perfume on to choke half the congregation…I think you get my drift. She continuously talks to her husband, is looking over her shoulder during the homily, even during the consecration she is at it. I was so upset with her that she was such a distraction, I actually let out two huge sighs in church and then stopped myself from doing it a third time. All I could think was " I’m going to stop them after church and ask them if they know how distracting they are to everyone around them!!!
Well I guess this is where the blessings of having children comes in. I would have moved.
I feel that Jesus wishing his disciples peace is no excuse for bad behavior in front of my children. I would have told my five year old that we were moving because people are too loud here.

Maybe she didn’t know she was distracting. Perhaps it would have made peace a reality if someone had been kind enough to tell this lady that her behavior was unacceptable. How else will she know??
 
40.png
MrS:
I guess I should be happy for you… but actually I am puzzled.

For all these admitted distractions, you seem to then have accepted a new version of the real presence. If nothing in the world could have been more real, … did you go to communion and receive the Real Real Presence?

Approximately 60 years after Luther wrote his 95 complaints, there was a book published called 200 Versions of the Real Presence (or something close to that title)… I wondered how anyone could ever think of more than one… now you have helped me see how.
Obviously you are trying to play with my words. maybe I wasn’t clear enough…You seem to imply that I don’t know about the real presence in the Eucharist. You are wrong, and if that isn’t your intention than I apologize. Are you saying that Christ is not present in that church with each and everyone of us! Do you think Christ is only present when you recieve communion, is he not there with us at an adoration chapel, was he not there when my father died and I needed his comfort, was he not there when I begged his forgiveness in a confessional?? You may want to play with my words but I know Christ is present in my life at all times. Forgive me if my words were confusing.
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
Well I guess this is where the blessings of having children comes in. I would have moved.
I feel that Jesus wishing his disciples peace is no excuse for bad behavior in front of my children. I would have told my five year old that we were moving because people are too loud here.

Maybe she didn’t know she was distracting. Perhaps it would have made peace a reality if someone had been kind enough to tell this lady that her behavior was unacceptable. How else will she know??
I am absolutely positive that she doesn’t realize how distracting she is. I discussed this with my mother after we left church and her thought was maybe I would upset her so much that she wouldn’t return to church. I tend to listen to my mother, she’s 88 and pretty smart. The point in the story was forgiveness and tolerance, I thought that was being kind.
 
40.png
Orionthehunter:
Regarding not being done on ESPN…
EWTN, not ESPN. :tiphat: They’d never air a Mass on ESPN unless we could figure out how to keep score.
 
40.png
maryj:
I have been giving this a lot of thought, and at first I believed that the sign of peace could be dropped and I wouldn’t have a problem with that…until I read this post… Mass is not a private devotion, we are there with our fellow catholics. We are to be united as one. If the Lord has asked us to forgive one another before we offer our sacrifice, the sign of peace is a perfect conveance of that. Let me explain. I sat down before mass last Sunday with my mother, and along comes this woman that occassionally sits in front of us, you know the type, doesn’t genuflect before entering the pew, is chewing gum when they enter, looking around to see who is in the church, has enough perfume on to choke half the congregation…I think you get my drift. She continuously talks to her husband, is looking over her shoulder during the homily, even during the consecration she is at it. I was so upset with her that she was such a distraction, I actually let out two huge sighs in church and then stopped myself from doing it a third time. All I could think was " I’m going to stop them after church and ask them if they know how distracting they are to everyone around them!!! I bring myself back into focus to hear… Lord Jesus Christ, you said to your apostles:
I leave you peace my peace I give you, Look not on our sins but on the faith of your church…Honest I almost started to giggle out loud. There it was, I knew at that second that I was going to have to shake her hand and forgive her for all her distractions, and in return she would forgive me for thinking about smacking her in the back of the head. Leave it behind before you come to the altar. The sign of peace is there for a reason and I will believe nothing else but that my Lord taught me a very valuable lesson in that pew on Sunday. You are wrong, wrong,wrong if you think it distracts from the real presence. Nothing in the world could have been more real than Christs presence in the pew with me at that moment. Wow that felt good. Praise God!!!
The whole reason so many dislike the sign of peace is because it detracts from the Real Presence. People run around the church like they just entered a hoe-down, slapping each other on the back and greeting each other like long-lost friends. It’s ridiculous. The sign of peace most certainly does take away from the Real Presence. Every priest should put a stop to this type of behaviour and educate people on how to behave reverently in Mass.
 
I’m repeating here my earlier post because nobody has actually said anything about it.

**GIRM 56 b. does not specify what has to be done.

Rite of peace: before they share in the same bread, the faithful implore peace and unity for the Church and for the whole human family and offer some sign of their love for one another.
The form the sign of peace should take is left to the conference of bishops to determine, in accord with the culture and customs of the people.**

As it does not specify what is or is not to be done I wonder why everyone thinks they know what movements or gestures are allowed or not.
 
40.png
paramedicgirl:
The whole reason so many dislike the sign of peace is because it detracts from the Real Presence. People run around the church like they just entered a hoe-down, slapping each other on the back and greeting each other like long-lost friends. It’s ridiculous. The sign of peace most certainly does take away from the Real Presence. Every priest should put a stop to this type of behaviour and educate people on how to behave reverently in Mass.
Well in my church no one and I mean no one is running around slapping each other on the back, it is quiet and reverent. Our priest has even instructed us on how to bow before the Eucharist, with great reverence. It (the sign of peace) is not a distraction for me or anyone I know of except here on this board. Maybe someone needs to speak with the priests in these churches and express their concerns. Do you think maybe it’s just an education thing? If the parishioners at your churches behaved with dignity during the sign of peace would it still be a distraction to you? so many questions…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top