M
MorEphrem
Guest
I have a few opinion-related questions about the sign of the cross:
(1) Is there a normative/superlative manner of signing? Obviously it is known that there are multiple methods of signing (I can think of four) but do any carry more value than another in your opinion?
(2) Is it right for a priest to reprimand someone for signing with a different formula? I am of the opinion (as is Fr. Salim, author of Captivated by Your Teachings) that the Maronite Church should return to the proper Syriac manner of signing (as how I was taught to sign anyway) because of the theological implications. However, I was reprimanded in two very public settings (to say the least - one being the seat of our patriarchate) for “doing it the orthodox way.”
(3) What are the different significances of the different formulas in comparison to one another?
(I realize the sign of the cross is a general Catholic gesture but I found it relevant to EC particularly since the ECCs contain all variations).
(1) Is there a normative/superlative manner of signing? Obviously it is known that there are multiple methods of signing (I can think of four) but do any carry more value than another in your opinion?
(2) Is it right for a priest to reprimand someone for signing with a different formula? I am of the opinion (as is Fr. Salim, author of Captivated by Your Teachings) that the Maronite Church should return to the proper Syriac manner of signing (as how I was taught to sign anyway) because of the theological implications. However, I was reprimanded in two very public settings (to say the least - one being the seat of our patriarchate) for “doing it the orthodox way.”
(3) What are the different significances of the different formulas in comparison to one another?
(I realize the sign of the cross is a general Catholic gesture but I found it relevant to EC particularly since the ECCs contain all variations).