I had almost similar questions when I read several of the reviews and commentaries about the film (that are from faithful Catholic sources). However they’re more like questions about martyrdom and apostasy. Would it be considered a sin to be
coerced into apostasy? I read somewhere in an
AAA here that coercion doesn’t count as voluntary, which is a requirement if one is to actually sin.
Also is it actually sinful to avoid martyrdom? It is cowardice, yes, but… considering the dire circumstances of the Christians during this time period in history in this specific place, and the weak nature of human beings, would be the avoidance of martyrdom be sinful
per se? I mean, it would be rash and imprudent to just go out a 17th century Japanese village and proclaim loud and proud that you’re a Christian, when professing the faith in public would be considered reason for treason and therefore execution. And we have also seen several instances when Christians would go into hiding so they could profess the faith. The ancient Roman catacombs are a testament to that, so were the “priest holes” found in many English Catholic homes during the Tudor era in England.
I think these questions are posed by the novel (and I assume to an extent the film), rather than answered by the novel. And I think it’s this aspect that
some (not all) of the conservative reviews miss about Silence. It seems that they follow the assumption that fiction has to be didactic to be great, when sometimes the best fiction out there sometimes depict human weakness and sinfulness. If you ask me didactic fiction is part of the reason why many (evangelical) Christian films are so bad.
I haven’t watched the film, mind you. It’s still hasn’t premiered here in the Philippines. You’d think a predominantly Catholic country that was under Japanese occupation during World War II would have released it around the same month as in the US…]