D
Dolphin
Guest
Seems like anti-Catholic sentiments are becoming increasingly irrelevant and bizarre.
Yes, but given that the period correct term would be something based on the act, and be something like “sodomite” . . . it wouldn’t go over well . . .It is anachronistic to talk about somebody being “gay” back in the 15th/16th century.
I think it would be deliberately provocative to say “sodomite”, although the term was, historically used. I think “homosexual” is a perfectly good, neutral term. It also has the benefit of encompassing all same-sex attracted people, not necessarily those who engaged in same-sex acts.Yes, but given that the period correct term would be something based on the act, and be something like “sodomite” . . . it wouldn’t go over well . . .
Such lists often include the likes of Leonardo, Michelangelo, Donatello, Botticelli, Caravaggio, Queen Christina of Sweden, King James VI and I, Cardinal Carafa, Cardinal Antonio Barberini the Younger, the Cardinal Duke of York, Alexander the Great, Caesar, Nero, Hadrian, and Sappho. More speculative candidates sometimes include Joan of Arc, Shakespeare, and Florence Nightingale. It’s all somewhat ridiculous. Some of these probably experienced same-sex attraction and some probably engaged in same-sex acts, while others pursued a kind of intense friendship between people of the same sex which was specific to their culture. We can be sure that none of them would have comprehended to concept of “LGBTQQI”.I’ve always been amused by the lists of alleged “gay historical figures”. The reasonings, in all but a few cases, see to be applications of modern or ancient stereotypes.