I would propose that you focus rather on the
current liturgy, and save “the history of liturgical development” for a later time. The more people know about the current liturgy (Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of Mass), the more they’d be receptive to the history of liturgical development, I think.
I’m working on a putting together a ten-chapter course on the Ordinary Form. Here’s the description I sent out to some of my fellow parishioners:
Our goal is to understand the origins and meanings of the parts of Mass, as well as see where in Scripture many of the elements and texts of the Mass come from. For instance, the greeting the priest gives at the beginning of Mass (whether it’s “The Lord be with you”, “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all”, or “The grace and peace of God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ be with you”) is taken directly from Scripture.
I’ve been working at putting together a “course of study” which is comprised of ten “sessions” (although we might meet more than once for a particular session):
*]Introduction to the study group (purpose, background, etc.)
*]The environment of church buildings
*]Preparation before Mass of both laity and clergy
*]Introductory Rites
*]Liturgy of the Word, Part 1 (stopping short of the creed)
*]Liturgy of the Word, Part 2 (creed and the general intercessions)
*]Liturgy of the Eucharist, Part 1 (Offertory through the Sanctus (“Holy, Holy, Holy”))
*]Liturgy of the Eucharist, Part 2 (the Eucharistic Prayer, looking at EPs I, II, II, IV, and the two EPs for reconciliation)
*]Liturgy of the Eucharist, Part 3 (from the Our Father through reception of Holy Communion)
*]Concluding Rites
My vision for the group is that we would meet (preferably weekly, but every other week is fine too) and start with evening prayer (vespers) and then go into some conversation over a group of questions for the subject matter (e.g. What does a priest wear? What are the various liturgical colors? Why do we say “Amen” to prayers?). After we’ve looked at the questions and offered our own answers and perspectives (and probably asked more questions), we move on to the study part, where we would go through the material I’ve collected (and arranged in an orderly fashion) to see what the Church teaches about the particular parts of Mass – in other words, what the official and historical meanings and origins are (e.g. why water is mixed with wine, why we make the sign of the cross and why Eastern Catholics and Orthodox make it in the opposite direction, what the priest says in his silent prayers).
The study is really an effort at “liturgical formation”. The goal is not just to be “book-smart” about the Mass but to help us to achieve that “full, conscious, and active participation” that the Second Vatican Council described as the very purpose of the liturgical reform. In order to actively participate (which is interior as well as exterior), we need to understand what we’re participating in: why we make certain gestures, why we say certain things, why priests don’t celebrate Mass in ordinary clothing, etc.
It’s my hope that we can all learn something and come to appreciate the Mass more. It’s like a Bible Study, but it’s not just the Bible (although it’s more of the Bible than you might think).