C
Cathoholic
Guest
Then (in your paradigm) you’ve just changed doctrines.
And the “dignity” argument will be just as applicable when applied in other circumstances where mortally stopping a person is necessary.
Defending your country via war? Inadmissible. Dignity.
Police stopping an aggreesor? Inadmissable.
Dad stopping a home invader? Dad is the violater here. Not the bad guy. Inadmissible.
So according to you (in principle) the Church is STILL getting it wrong in these areas.
By the way. Pope Francis thinks indefinite incarceration is an affront to human dignity too.
Archbishop Gomez (who wrote that very point last week) thinks so too.
(EDIT: That part from Archbishop Gomez about no indefinite incarceration seems to now be gone from the source that I read, so I retract this portion of mine for now. [Next time I will screen-capture it.])
So what other “developments” would you see coming with THAT?
And the “dignity” argument will be just as applicable when applied in other circumstances where mortally stopping a person is necessary.
Defending your country via war? Inadmissible. Dignity.
Police stopping an aggreesor? Inadmissable.
Dad stopping a home invader? Dad is the violater here. Not the bad guy. Inadmissible.
So according to you (in principle) the Church is STILL getting it wrong in these areas.
By the way. Pope Francis thinks indefinite incarceration is an affront to human dignity too.
Archbishop Gomez (who wrote that very point last week) thinks so too.
(EDIT: That part from Archbishop Gomez about no indefinite incarceration seems to now be gone from the source that I read, so I retract this portion of mine for now. [Next time I will screen-capture it.])
So what other “developments” would you see coming with THAT?
Last edited: