M
mdgspencer
Guest
This article speaks of the reality and dimensions of the sin of sloth.
This is at sunday.niedziela.pl/artykul.php?dz=wiara&id_art=00069
This is at sunday.niedziela.pl/artykul.php?dz=wiara&id_art=00069
I read the interesting article. Somehow, I think there is an additional explanation for sloth, but I can’t find the right words. Could doing something unnecessarily slow be sloth? Maybe as a child, I connected sloth with slow. The two words do begin with the same three letters.This article speaks of the reality and dimensions of the sin of sloth.
This is at sunday.niedziela.pl/artykul.php?dz=wiara&id_art=00069
I am no expert in moral theology, so I looked up what the standard book, Tanquerey's "The Spiritual Life," says, in case this helps. Tanquerey wrote:
"There are various degrees of sloth. The indolent man takes up his task reluctantly, and indifferently; what he does, he does badly. The sluggard does not absolutely refuse to work, but he delays and postpones indefinitely the accepted task...
The slothful man fails in this twofold obligation imposed by natural and positive law; he sins more or less grieviously according to the gravity of the duties he neglects. When he goes so far as to neglect the religious duties necessary to his salvation or sanctification, there is a grievious fault, and so when he wilfully neglects, in matters of importance, any of his duties of state. As long as this torpor causes him to fail in civil or religious duties of lesser importance, the sin is but venial. However, the downward grade is slippery, and if we do not struggle against sloth it soon becomes more dangerous, more baleful and more reprehensible."