Well, anonymous is not actually a hacking “organization”, and they tend to laugh at people who view them that way. It’s more a collectivist group of people with computer skills (hacking being one of them) who sometimes rally around a cause and go to town trying to “defend” it.
Sometimes this is bad news, like a sector claiming to be anon attacking chik-fil-a simply because of a difference which was clearly freedom of speech (but again, Anon has no official organization, so it’s easy for people to hijack the name for their personal and nefarious causes). Other times, anon has done some very good things… such as knightsec’s aggression regarding a 16 year old rape victim whose perpetrators were being protected by a corrupt justice system surrounding a football team (they recovered deleted videos of the perpetrators laughing about the crime and exposed the fact that the county prosecutor who was talking the family out of pressing charges was the mother of the boy who threw the party where the rape occured).
At it’s best, Anon takes up causes to defend basic freedoms online. At it’s worst, Anon is aggressive about demonstrating their ability to bully others into submission. So any given job you can take with a grain of salt as to whether or not you want to view their actions in a favorable light… but I don’t think it’s fair to say that all hackers or all hacking action is necessarily WRONG and necessarily exposes FALSE information (examples: attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities, exposing a science institute’s coverup of opposing view information regarding global warming, etc)