Hang on, now…
I think the Church is supremely wise not to declare it a sin to smoke. Inadvisable, bad for your health, yes, but a sin?
I agree with the person who said that smoking becomes a sin if it somehow stops you from feeding your kids or something.
I know a guy who ate junk food - a LOT - constantly, and had a heart attack at age 38. Seven-way bypass he had, at age 38! And his Dad had had the same thing only 7 years earlier. His doctors warned him and everything. Was eating junk food, for him, a sin?
Yeah, probably: in his case, to the degree he did it, it was definitely an abuse of his body.
But should the Church then declare that ‘eating junk food is a sin’? No. Because it’s like drinking wine - it’s not ‘health food,’ but in moderation, it is one of life’s pleasures and does not count as an abuse of one’s body or health.
The Church is wise to teach that we must treat our bodies as temples. That means moderation, prudence, wise choices for our particular station in life, etc. I’m single. I tithe 10%. I have no debt. If I smoke two cigarettes a day - is that a sin, just because it could cause me health problems? I don’t think so.
I’m married. I’m in debt. I don’t share any of my worldly goods with anyone, and my kids go without decent food or clothes because I buy lottery tickets, subscribe to fifteen magazines, and buy useless junk at garage sales. Well, then, buying lottery tickets, subscribing to those magazines, and buying that junk is sinful, because I’m abusing my wealth and not meeting my family obligations. But it wouldn’t make any sense for the Church to declare that buying lottery tickets, subscribing to magazines and impulse shopping at garage sales are sins.
Our station in life has a lot to do with whether something is an abuse of our gifts. And the condition or make-up of our bodies has a lot to do with whether this food or that drink, etc. is an abuse of our bodies. An alcoholic who can’t take one drink without going on a binge and driving drunk had better not take that drink. It would be a sin for him to deliberately take that first drink. A person with emphysema had better not smoke that cigarette. But not everyone is harmed by a drink or a cigarette. Not every pack-a-day smoker gets cancer (my aunt showed no ill affects from smoking for over 50 years! Died in her bed of natural causes unrelated to smoking).
What next? Sinful cholesterol and virtuous cholesterol?
Our bodies are temples - not idols. We leave them behind. They all die of something. Let’s not get carried away with scrupulosity here.