V
Valke2
Guest
The commandment to be frutiful and multipy applies to the men only. Women are not obligated to be so because childbirth carries the risk of death and we are commanded to live by Torah…
But only the men are obligated. The women can say no and not be in breach of a commandment.ahem… so just how these men to be fruitful and multiply with then? By the laws of nature, it would have to apply to both sexes because 1 sex can’t manage it alone.
Are you comparing the different beliefs on birth control?But only the men are obligated. The women can say no and not be in breach of a commandment.
I wasn’t really thinking about birth control. My only point was that in Judaism, the positive commandment to be fruitful and multiply is for men only. It is not a commandment which I woman must follow and if she chooses not to have children, she is not violating the commandment.Are you comparing the different beliefs on birth control?
Being a convert to Catholicism I might be off on this but I believe that the church’s view is that men and women should leave themselves open to the possibility of life. That means no artificial birth control but Catholics can use natural planning methods. That is why there are some very religious Catholics families with only a couple kids.
I do know of some Protestant families who believe that all planning should be left to God and that there shouldn’t be any say on the parent’s part as to how far apart children should be spaced.
The majority of nonCatholics seem okay with any type of birth control, artifical or not.
Not really. If the woman were obligated to this commandment, it would mean she would be committing a sin if she didn’t marry and have children. Because childbirth carried such a high risk of death in biblical times, and because we are not supposed to die by Torah, but to live by it, the obligation was never imposed on women.I’m not buying it.
**It’s not logical, not that I know the mind of God.**
Common sense says man would be unable to fulfill his duty to God if their wives were not also bound by the same law. It’s a marriage law, which binds them both.
The commandment to be frutiful and multipy applies to the men only. Women are not obligated to be so because childbirth carries the risk of death and we are commanded to live by Torah…
No. It was not my intent to compare birth control. Only to show that in Judaism, the woman is not obligated to have children. Because the act of childbirth has historically been such a life threatening event and we are supposed to live by Torah’s commandments, not die by them (in the vast majority of circumstances).Are you comparing the different beliefs on birth control?
Being a convert to Catholicism I might be off on this but I believe that the church’s view is that men and women should leave themselves open to the possibility of life. That means no artificial birth control but Catholics can use natural planning methods. That is why there are some very religious Catholics families with only a couple kids.
I do know of some Protestant families who believe that all planning should be left to God and that there shouldn’t be any say on the parent’s part as to how far apart children should be spaced.
The majority of nonCatholics seem okay with any type of birth control, artifical or not.
Jews also have an Oral Torah, (Talmud) which was given to Moses at SInai. Talmud is made up of the Mishna (what was given to Moses) and the Gemara (later rabbinic commentary). It aslo contains other commentaries on the commentary, including the commentary of Rashi, one of the most followed Rabbis in Judaism. Talmud sets forth the laws based on the commandments in the Torah, Prophets, etc.
How did you get the impression God was speaking only to Adam???
I suppose it’s possible that through the generations the teaching from the rabbis modified the meaning of this passage, but then that would fall on that rabbi’s personal interpretation. I don’t know, but do rabbi’s believe they have the authority to change scripture? The passage looks rather clear to me as it is.
Again, the thinking is that we are supposed to live for GOd’s word, not die for it. CHildbirth carried a high risk of death so it would be wrong to require a woman to risk death in order to fullfill the commandement. Additionally, there is the reason that I set forth regrading the actual hebrew words for the commandment. As far as the Nazirites, if they were required to stay virgins, there would not be very many of them.So a man IS committing a sin if he doesn’t marry and have children, but a woman isn’t if she doesn’t? I really don’t understand the thinking. Again, two people, one of each gender, are needed to make a marriage as well. Numbers of men and women are roughly 50-50, so it logically follows that if all the men need to be married then all the women do too.
I know the Nazirites were (are?) bound by all sorts of restrictions, such as to not cut their hair or drink alcohol. I was under the impression that they also stayed virgin. Of course I could be mistaken.
What is the Jewish tradition about Jesus? Is it commonly believed among Jews that he ever married or not? And how does this affect whether they respect him as a teacher?
Valke, I don’t know if this is related or not. When my husband used to attend synagogue every Sabbath, I was told that the wife wasn’t required to because her job preparing the home for the Sabbath was very important.(I might have heard wrong) Is that correct?Again, the thinking is that we are supposed to live for GOd’s word, not die for it. CHildbirth carried a high risk of death so it would be wrong to require a woman to risk death in order to fullfill the commandement. Additionally, there is the reason that I set forth regrading the actual hebrew words for the commandment. As far as the Nazirites, if they were required to stay virgins, there would not be very many of them.
You logic is flawed because it assumes that since women are not “commanded” to multiply, they don’t. That is obviously not the case.
Jesus plays no part in our religion. There is not jewish tradition about him. However, assuming that Jesus was a rabbi (and despite what many jews say on these boards, that is not an assumption that Jewish tradition embraces), it would have been unusal for him to be in his thirities and unmarried. This would not have caused jews to disrespect him as a teacher as much as his discarding the Talmud/Oral Torah would have.What is the Jewish tradition about Jesus? Is it commonly believed among Jews that he ever married or not? And how does this affect whether they respect him as a teacher?
That is correct. The commandment for community prayer is a positive commandment and one that a woman is not obligated to keep. It’s a complicated issue but your post is essentially correct.Valke, I don’t know if this is related or not. When my husband used to attend synagogue every Sabbath, I was told that the wife wasn’t required to because her job preparing the home for the Sabbath was very important.(I might have heard wrong) Is that correct?
In 1:27 we are told that the Creater made man in His image. Man is made into two parts:male (referred to as man) and female (referred to as woman). However, both are reffered to as “man” according to what is written. This makes sense when we consider that woman was taken from the rib of man. He gave the Command to the man so that he (and woman as one) may be partners in His continuing work of creation and producing life.Again, the thinking is that we are supposed to live for GOd’s word, not die for it. CHildbirth carried a high risk of death so it would be wrong to require a woman to risk death in order to fullfill the commandement. Additionally, there is the reason that I set forth regrading the actual hebrew words for the commandment.
Decide what? I’m pretty clear on what it means to me.This is and anything that we may say to you will be just headknowledge. Valke, you must pray and seek clarity. Then decide.
Peace be with you.