Z
Ziggamafu
Guest
I just don’t get it. Why do Protestants remain Protestant after hearing the problem of sola scriptura?
**Catholic Question: **Ultimately, by what authority do you judge anyone’s interpretations or experiences of the Holy Spirit (including your own) as true and authentic?
Protestant Answer: The Bible.
Catholic Question: Ultimately, by what authority do you judge the canon (and thus, the content) of the Bible as true and authentic?
Protestant Answer: The Holy Spirit.
Catholic Question: That’s circular reasoning.
…but it doesn’t stop there, like it should. It is so annoying. You explain that we can figure out that the Gospels are historically accurate and, in conjunction with other extra-biblical sources, discover that according to the historic record’s presentation of Christ, He must be God. That same historic record reveals this God-man starting an authoritative Church and sending this Church out to preach (not to write). Then, as decades pass, that Church begins to write things, later discovering that some are fallible and others are not. And centuries down the road, the Church declares a list of certain writings that it says have been divinely inspired. Centuries later, the Church compiles the writings and organizes them. More centuries pass before these writings are commonly accessible via the printing press. Sola scriptura is just so, so absurd. Why, oh, why do so many otherwise intelligent Protestants fall for it and so stubbornly maintain its defense?
**Catholic Question: **Ultimately, by what authority do you judge anyone’s interpretations or experiences of the Holy Spirit (including your own) as true and authentic?
Protestant Answer: The Bible.
Catholic Question: Ultimately, by what authority do you judge the canon (and thus, the content) of the Bible as true and authentic?
Protestant Answer: The Holy Spirit.
Catholic Question: That’s circular reasoning.
…but it doesn’t stop there, like it should. It is so annoying. You explain that we can figure out that the Gospels are historically accurate and, in conjunction with other extra-biblical sources, discover that according to the historic record’s presentation of Christ, He must be God. That same historic record reveals this God-man starting an authoritative Church and sending this Church out to preach (not to write). Then, as decades pass, that Church begins to write things, later discovering that some are fallible and others are not. And centuries down the road, the Church declares a list of certain writings that it says have been divinely inspired. Centuries later, the Church compiles the writings and organizes them. More centuries pass before these writings are commonly accessible via the printing press. Sola scriptura is just so, so absurd. Why, oh, why do so many otherwise intelligent Protestants fall for it and so stubbornly maintain its defense?