However, along those same lines, if you think about it psychologically, it’s a confused and devaluing approach to communion to downplay the importance of a prior confession. Psychologically, it’s very true we want to emphasize Christ’s mercy and goodwill in our lives, but it doesn’t mean people can just behave any way they want. By providing communion “as is” to a corrupt soul, it seems to fortify a corrupt soul; or, in other words, it doesnt make much of a difference - the person will just keep repeating the same bad behavior, even feeling justified in so doing.
On the other hand, if Parishioners can’t get to communion without being properly confessed, then it’s different for both Priest and Parishioner. For the Priests, they have to realize Parishioners need them to be confessed, so the Priests have to “be there” appropriately providing the sacrament of confession in the same amount as communion. The person has to really examen their faults, confess to them, and do something right in light of an accountability partner (the Priest’s penance conferred); and, then, the soul can be strengthened by the graces of communion.
Please note, I hate a lot of psychology, so I wouldn’t argue from a psychological standpoint, if I didn’t think it spiritually helpful. But, then, a lot of psychology is just plain bogus anyway.
My point seems to be - when Priests and Parishioners claim Christ’s mercy is infinite and unbounded - they are right; we could never wholly live up the the values in the CCC, and Catholic “guilt” stinks. So, yes, we should definitely promote Christ’s mercy all we can 100%, as we are called to do.
But, then, how are we to learn, if we can’t identify when we are wrong?
And, if we are but Parishioners, how are we to convince our Pastoral and Liturgical Planners the old ways actually work sometimes…?
When I think of this problem, I look at it on the broadest level, btw… I’ve never committed anything like some moderns Priests have, but I dare say - if Seminarians were taught “any love is good love” without being taught how to administer appropriate penances, then what could come of it?