M
MakeUpArtist
Guest
I think you might be confusing a hysterectomy with a tubal ligation. 
Could you be any more uncharitable and judgemental.?I know they are done unnecessarily (along with the NECESSARY ones–duh!) because I’ve had more than one doctor offer to do one on me. I have PCOS–that was undiagnosed for years by lazy doctors who didn’t want to mess with testing me. They offered to ‘get rid of the problem’ by doing a total hyster on me before age 30. That, or take birth control pills, those were the options I was given. Once I finally found a competent doctor, it was as simple as doing enough tests to find the problem, then prescribing a simple pill I take daily (NOT birth control!). But if I would have listened to the other docs, I would be sterile for NO REASON.
And I know it has happened to others. I have had several women tell me they had hysters just because they started menopause, so their doc said they better ‘take it out before it caused problems–then you can start your hormone replacement’. We need to find out about our health issues, and get second, and even third opinions. Many surgeries are unnecessary, and hysters with no diagnosis of cancer are right up there on the list. So what is next–I have a stomachache, so remove the entire digestive system? A headache–so take the brain out? Many gyn problems can be fixed by competent specialists, like reproductive endocrinologists, without surgery. That was my point. You do not have to take it all out just because there is a problem–there are other treatments available, but most people blindly follow their docs who push surgery instead of finding out their options. Just like people vote without knowing all the facts. We are turning into a country of sheep, and that is just pathetic.
Totally befuddled by this thread. We women ovulate monthly…and more often than not shed the egg(s) without creating a life. How is this fact made “sad” in the context of a hysterectomy? If there’s any sadness to be found it’s for the woman who more likely than not was undergoing the procedure to avoid a serious threat to her health.That’s a bit of an overreaction considering there was absolutely no indication in the story of why this woman was having a hysterectomy.
Totally befuddled by this thread. We women ovulate monthly…and more often than not shed the egg(s) without creating a life. How is this fact made “sad” in the context of a hysterectomy? If there’s any sadness to be found it’s for the woman who more likely than not was undergoing the procedure to avoid a serious threat to her health.
Exactly. Is every “unfertilised” egg to be an occasion of sadness…???Totally befuddled by this thread. We women ovulate monthly…and more often than not shed the egg(s) without creating a life. How is this fact made “sad” in the context of a hysterectomy?
It is a terrible thing that you did not find a doctor willing to put more effort and thought into finding a less drastic answer for your health issue. That is certainly deeply offensive and traumatic, and probably frightening for you as well. It is completely true that we can’t always blindly follow just any doctor’s recommendation, but certainly many women pray for guidance in the face of such a deeply personal decision. We also must acknowledge that the Holy Spirit also guides His people in so many different ways – sometimes they know in an instant what they must do.I know they are done unnecessarily (along with the NECESSARY ones–duh!) because I’ve had more than one doctor offer to do one on me. I have PCOS–that was undiagnosed for years by lazy doctors who didn’t want to mess with testing me. They offered to ‘get rid of the problem’ by doing a total hyster on me before age 30. That, or take birth control pills, those were the options I was given. Once I finally found a competent doctor, it was as simple as doing enough tests to find the problem, then prescribing a simple pill I take daily (NOT birth control!). But if I would have listened to the other docs, I would be sterile for NO REASON.
And I know it has happened to others. I have had several women tell me they had hysters just because they started menopause, so their doc said they better ‘take it out before it caused problems–then you can start your hormone replacement’. We need to find out about our health issues, and get second, and even third opinions. Many surgeries are unnecessary, and hysters with no diagnosis of cancer are right up there on the list. So what is next–I have a stomachache, so remove the entire digestive system? A headache–so take the brain out? Many gyn problems can be fixed by competent specialists, like reproductive endocrinologists, without surgery. That was my point. You do not have to take it all out just because there is a problem–there are other treatments available, but most people blindly follow their docs who push surgery instead of finding out their options. Just like people vote without knowing all the facts. We are turning into a country of sheep, and that is just pathetic.
Well, I am befuddled by the fact that the thread has turned into a hostile argument about hysterectomies (well actually more frustrated than surprised). But I actually can see what she meant by sad, although I’d say more bittersweet. I think for many (perhaps most?) women who have hysterectomies, it is a sad event. It may be an easy decision because of the health need (or perceived need), but most women mourn the loss of their fertility when it goes (even if it is through natural menopause), and a hysterectomy is very sudden way for that to happen. To then see your body still actively being fertile, and watching this amazing feet of preparing for a new life, all the while you know you are bluntly ending your fertile years, might make me feel sad. Assuming I really needed the surgery, I’d deal, but at the least it would be bittersweet.Totally befuddled by this thread. We women ovulate monthly…and more often than not shed the egg(s) without creating a life. How is this fact made “sad” in the context of a hysterectomy? If there’s any sadness to be found it’s for the woman who more likely than not was undergoing the procedure to avoid a serious threat to her health.
I wouldn’t call it bittersweet because I don’t know what would be considered the sweet part.Well, I am befuddled by the fact that the thread has turned into a hostile argument about hysterectomies (well actually more frustrated than surprised). But I actually can see what she meant by sad, although I’d say more bittersweet. I think for many (perhaps most?) women who have hysterectomies, it is a sad event. It may be an easy decision because of the health need (or perceived need), but most women mourn the loss of their fertility when it goes (even if it is through natural menopause), and a hysterectomy is very sudden way for that to happen. To then see your body still actively being fertile, and watching this amazing feet of preparing for a new life, all the while you know you are bluntly ending your fertile years, might make me feel sad. Assuming I really needed the surgery, I’d deal, but at the least it would be bittersweet.
I just mean - happy that I’m going to be healthy again, yet simultaneously sad about the loss of my fertility. Maybe bittersweet isn’t quite right either.I wouldn’t call it bittersweet because I don’t know what would be considered the sweet part.
When you’re given a choice of “have this surgery” or “die” it’s pretty easy to make the decision. It’s afterward that you have to deal with what that means in terms of fertility and other issues.
I was thinking the same thing.I wouldn’t call it bittersweet because I don’t know what would be considered the sweet part.
When you’re given a choice of “have this surgery” or “die” it’s pretty easy to make the decision. It’s afterward that you have to deal with what that means in terms of fertility and other issues.