Google “C students run the world”
As an example:
jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16/c-students-more-successful-than-a-students/
Code:
The success of 'C' students happens mostly because they were learning about the world and how to manage it when the 'A' students were tethered to their books. 'C' students competed for class office, put in plenty of time at the college newspaper, started advocacy organizations, worked part time, fell in love too often, and engaged in other activities.
All that provided direct insight into what makes people tick, how the world really operates, and strategies for recovering from a defeat.
Former chief executive officer of [Home Depot](http://aol.careerbuilder.com/jobs/company/home+depot?siteid=cbaol95news) and head of Cererbus Operating and Advisory Company [Robert Nardelli](http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/biography/M-R/Nardelli-Robert-L-1948.html) was a so-so student. Where he put his energy was in making his mark in organizations such as the Boy Scouts. After he wasn't appointed chief executive officer of GE, he sure nailed down other big jobs.
President John F. Kennedy was no brain, but his golden gut told him to surround himself with those who were (note: they worked for him). And you know how lackluster a student President George W. Bush had been. One-term president Jimmy Carter was the brain.
John Kennedy succeeded because of his golden gut? Maybe his dad’s golden brick road stretching out before him had just a little to do with it? Do we really think that George W. Bush would have been elected president without George HW Bush’s rolladex? Let’s just eliminate role models who made the wise choice of being born the child of parents with wealth, power, and ambition. They could not be more irrelevant to the 99%.
Being a person whose intelligence is put to things other than school is very different than being a person of intelligence who shrinks from developing himself and putting himself out into the world. I have known and taught a lot of “so-so” students that anyone could see were going to succeed. They were smart and dedicated–just not to school! Suffice it to say that the vast majority of my so-so peers and so-so students
did not fit into this category. Most C students are not particularly hard-working, not particularly perceptive, and not particularly ambitious. Neither can it be assumed that a C student is turning in so-so grades because they “competed for class office, put in plenty of time at the college newspaper, started advocacy organizations, worked part time, fell in love too often, and engaged in other activities.” Well, maybe the love thing, but other than that, the chances are that they put too much time in on ESPN, gossiping, and their X-Boxes. These are not the C students who are going to be running the world in 20 years, let’s just say that.
What kills A students is a fear of not getting an A. If they get into a situation where they can’t be perfect, an A student is vulnerable to freezing up or staying away. The C student knows that failure never killed anybody. That is an advantage, yes, because real life usually does not give out As, the exams have no syllabus, and the date and the location of the test is almost never announced beforehand. A C student can cope with that. An A student may not like the lay of that land, preferring a situation that is more controlled. He or she may also be used to being the best in everything, every time. The only way to accomplish that is for your “everything” to have a very confined scope. That is also not the way to become extraordinary.
Besides, the OP is an A student, not a C student. Simply letting his grades slip will not make him into the uber-achiever C student. It will make him an under-achieving A student. The idea, instead, is to look at the rules of the game by which C students achieve success.