Sola Fide and Renouncing False Religions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Madaglan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Madaglan

Guest
I’ve read in several Protestant works that, before one can believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved, one must first reject, renounce and do away with all previous false religions and false human idols. I’ve often wondered, does this not negate the Protestant (especially the evangelical) notion of sola fide? If we must first do something (namely work ourselves to do away with false conceptions and idols) before coming to faith and being justified, does not that detract from the free gift of salvation in Christ and the one-time justification of the sinner?

It seems to me, the way some evangelicals write, that we must do something to receive saving faith. What do you think?
 
I’ve read in several Protestant works that, before one can believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved, one must first reject, renounce and do away with all previous false religions and false human idols. I’ve often wondered, does this not negate the Protestant (especially the evangelical) notion of sola fide? If we must first do something (namely work ourselves to do away with false conceptions and idols) before coming to faith and being justified, does not that detract from the free gift of salvation in Christ and the one-time justification of the sinner?

It seems to me, the way some evangelicals write, that we must do something to receive saving faith. What do you think?
again, this is just not understanding sola fide. all Christians believe in sola gratia (that we are saved by grace alone). it is how we receive that grace that is in question. renouncing other Gods is a matter of faith, not works. protestants teach that we receive that saving grace (not saving faith) through faith in (or turning our hearts towards) the one, true God. by this faith alone we receive the grace of God which saves us. this faith will produce works in our lives (the works come out of grace received by faith). the works play no role in “earning” God’s saving grace. it is freely given to all those who have the faith that God will give it. then we are fully capable of doing works.
 
I’ve read in several Protestant works that, before one can believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved, one must first reject, renounce and do away with all previous false religions and false human idols. I’ve often wondered, does this not negate the Protestant (especially the evangelical) notion of sola fide? If we must first do something (namely work ourselves to do away with false conceptions and idols) before coming to faith and being justified, does not that detract from the free gift of salvation in Christ and the one-time justification of the sinner?

It seems to me, the way some evangelicals write, that we must do something to receive saving faith. What do you think?
Although not a false idol, it’s interesting that Protestants seem to idolise the Bible!
 

in the same way catholics “idolize” Mary? come on, everyone can take cheap shots.
i think what that person should have said,was mis-interpting the bible(in which were all guilty of,us lay people that is).I believe in Mary praying for us,I dont idolize her,shes not God,but shes trying to lead us more to her son.Didnt Our Lord say,that He is the God of the Living? Pray for us Most Holy Virgin!!That we may be made worthy of the promises of Christ!..
 
again, this is just not understanding sola fide. all Christians believe in sola gratia (that we are saved by grace alone). it is how we receive that grace that is in question. renouncing other Gods is a matter of faith, not works
Except that faith itself is a work:

John 6:29
Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

So, believing is a work. And if one must first disbelieve, that is a work. One must disown a previous false belief. In order to believe in Jesus Christ, one must first clear the ground for the seed of faith.
. protestants teach that we receive that saving grace (not saving faith) through faith
So God doesn’t call us first? We believe that everything good is from God. And faith in God is good therefore, God gives us the grace to have faith. Otherwise we could brag, “I have faith.” But God crowns His works and faith is a work.
in (or turning our hearts towards) the one, true God. by this faith alone we receive the grace of God which saves us. this faith will produce works in our lives (the works come out of grace received by faith). the works play no role in “earning” God’s saving grace. it is freely given to all those who have the faith that God will give it. then we are fully capable of doing works.
But the works are the sign of our faith and the works are the perfectors of our faith. And without these works we will not be saved. So faith alone is dead. It is by works that a man is justified and not by faith alone.

Now if evil works, or sins are the signs of our lack of faith, then good works are the sign of our faith. As the Apostle said:

James 2:18
Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
in the same way catholics “idolize” Mary? come on, everyone can take cheap shots.
I’m not Catholic so I can’t answer for them 😉

But the way people set the bible up in the centre of place of worship in some churches is like they’ve made the book an idol.
 
Not only they place the Bible in the center. My worries about many protestants, especially fundamentalists is that they in fact use the Bible like the Muslims use the Koran. As a perfect book, always in the perfect state in the mind of God, and call the Bible, the Word. (OK, I know Catholics do the same in the mass). And if you dare to interpret the Bible in a sense that is not literal (again unless is Revelations or John 6), you are an apostate.
For a moslem the Koran is the Word of God.
I believe that for a Christian, Jesus is the Word of God, not the Bible. There even wasn’t a Bible in the early church but there were christians them. So Christians made the Bible, not the Bible made the Christians, the Bible is not the Koran.
 
It’s something we do though, right? Doesn’t that make it a work of faith?
it comes out of faith. the faith is what allows us to experience the grace that saves. it’s not the renouncing of other gods. if i just renounced other gods but never had faith in the one true God, i would not experience grace.
 
Except that faith itself is a work:

John 6:29
Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

So, believing is a work. And if one must first disbelieve, that is a work. One must disown a previous false belief. In order to believe in Jesus Christ, one must first clear the ground for the seed of faith.
Jesus was redefining what “works” can get us to heaven. His point was that it is faith and not works that allow us to experience grace.
So God doesn’t call us first? We believe that everything good is from God. And faith in God is good therefore, God gives us the grace to have faith. Otherwise we could brag, “I have faith.” But God crowns His works and faith is a work…
i agree, but the grace to have faith is not a saving grace. God calls us to Him first, if we continually reject that call, that is how i would define blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. He calls us to faith, and when we have that faith, we get grace.
But the works are the sign of our faith and the works are the perfectors of our faith. ** And without these works we will not be saved.** So faith alone is dead. It is by works that a man is justified and not by faith alone.

Now if evil works, or sins are the signs of our lack of faith, then good works are the sign of our faith. As the Apostle said:

James 2:18
Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
i disagree with what i bolded. it’s not what the scripture says. even what you quoted doesn’t say that if we don’t do works we won’t be saved. it says that if our faith doesn’t produce works we won’t be saved. these are different. it’s the faith that gives us grace and this faith will produce works. (Eph. 2:8-9) then in verse 10 it says that we have been “saved” so that we may do the good works God planned for us.
 
again, this is just not understanding sola fide. all Christians believe in sola gratia (that we are saved by grace alone). it is how we receive that grace that is in question. renouncing other Gods is a matter of faith, not works. protestants teach that we receive that saving grace (not saving faith) through faith in (or turning our hearts towards) the one, true God. by this faith alone we receive the grace of God which saves us. this faith will produce works in our lives (the works come out of grace received by faith). the works play no role in “earning” God’s saving grace. it is freely given to all those who have the faith that God will give it. then we are fully capable of doing works.
Where can I get the official definition of sola fide that ALL protestants use? “we receive the grace of God which saves us. this faith will produce works in our lives.” - Unless one chooses not to cooperate with that grace.

P.S. Can someone brifely tell me how to respond to individual statements in a paragraph - like the one above from BengalFan? For instance, if I want to respond to the first sentence in the paragraph then the fourth. Does that make sense? Thanks.
 
it comes out of faith. the faith is what allows us to experience the grace that saves. it’s not the renouncing of other gods. if i just renounced other gods but never had faith in the one true God, i would not experience grace.
Can you define exactly how you distinguish between ‘Faith’ and ‘Works’
 
Jesus was redefining what “works” can get us to heaven. His point was that it is faith and not works that allow us to experience grace.
Not so, this is the question that Jesus was answering:
John 6:28
Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

To paraphrase, the Jews asked Jesus, “which work of God empowers us to perform works for God?”

And Jesus said, “believing in me empowers you to perform work for God.”

Neither the Jews nor Jesus insinuated that only one work was to be performed. The Jews understood that our works perfect and express our faith. As the Apostle says, “Faith without works is dead.”
i agree, but the grace to have faith is not a saving grace. God calls us to Him first, if we continually reject that call, that is how i would define blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. He calls us to faith, and when we have that faith, we get grace.
Faith is a work and faith is a grace. Faith is a gift of God. We must exercise that faith and when we do it becomes a work of God and we exercise that faith by performing good works in the name of God.

Romans 1:5
By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
i disagree with what i bolded. it’s not what the scripture says. even what you quoted doesn’t say that if we don’t do works we won’t be saved. it says that if our faith doesn’t produce works we won’t be saved. these are different.
You are splitting hairs. Its the difference of saying on one hand “God working through us” and on the other “we are working for God”. They are two ways of saying the same thing.

The only time that works are worthless is if they are done without God in the equation but for personal gain and profit.
it’s the faith that gives us grace and this faith will produce works. (Eph. 2:8-9) then in verse 10 it says that we have been “saved” so that we may do the good works God planned for us.
No it doesn’t. Your interpretation is a classic case of “eisegesis”. You are reading INTO Scripture.

Let me break it down for you:

*1. it’s the faith that gives us grace *

faith doesn’t give us grace. God gives us grace.

**8For by grace are ye saved… it is the gift of God:
**
*2. then in verse 10 it says that we have been “saved” so that we may do the good works God planned for us

*10For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

Verse 10 said we are created for good works. Not saved unto good works.

Ephesians 2:8-10
**
** 8For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: **
** 9Not of works, lest any man should boast. **
** 10For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.


In other words, God gives us the grace of faith for which we were created that we might walk in the good works which faith produces.

The problem is divorce. Protestants are the religion of divorce. First you divorced yourselves from the Catholic Church, then you divorced yourselves from your wives, then you divorced the Bible from Tradition, and here you want to divorce faith and works as though they were two different things. But they aren’t. People of faith, work for God. Because work is an expression of our faith. The more and better we work the more faith we have. Because works are transformative. It is easily seen in real life.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
P.S. Can someone brifely tell me how to respond to individual statements in a paragraph - like the one above from BengalFan? For instance, if I want to respond to the first sentence in the paragraph then the fourth. Does that make sense? Thanks.
Yes. You can even break down sentences and phrases… Sometimes people put more than one idea in a statement, whether it be a phrase, a sentence, a paragraph or an essay.
  1. Look for each idea and make sure it lines up with the “gestalt” (i.e. overall idea) of the statement. If it doesn’t, say so.
  2. Also look for underlying ideas (i.e. assumptions) which you need to bring to the surface so that you can engage them. The assumptions may be right or wrong, but when they remain hidden, they can change the meaning of the overall statement.
I hope that helps.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
Yes. You can even break down sentences and phrases…
Like this, kindaSometimes people put more than one idea in a statement, whether it be a phrase, a sentence, a paragraph or an essay.
  1. Look for each idea and make sure it lines up with the “gestalt” (i.e. overall idea) of the statement. If it doesn’t, say so.
    and this…
  2. Also look for underlying ideas (i.e. assumptions) which you need to bring to the surface so that you can engage them. The assumptions may be right or wrong, but when they remain hidden, they can change the meaning of the overall statement.
I hope that helps.

Sincerely,

De Maria
That’s awesome, but I meant how to do it like I’m trying to do with your response above. Make sense?
 
Like this, kinda
Sometimes people put more than one idea in a statement, whether it be a phrase, a sentence, a paragraph or an essay.
  1. Look for each idea and make sure it lines up with the “gestalt” (i.e. overall idea) of the statement. If it doesn’t, say so.
    *and this…
    1. Also look for underlying ideas (i.e. assumptions) which you need to bring to the surface so that you can engage them. The assumptions may be right or wrong, but when they remain hidden, they can change the meaning of the overall statement.
I hope that helps.

Sincerely,

De Maria*
That’s awesome, but I meant how to do it like I’m trying to do with your response above. Make sense?

I see, too many endquotes.

Try again. That didn’t look as though it quite worked?
  1. Take the slash ‘/’ out of the first quote command which is in front of the series of words you want to quote. Place the endquote command, the same way you tried above, in the end of the series of words. Like so:
words you want to quote

Just exchange the <> for the ].

Or

2.Highlight the words you want to be in the quote, then click on the word balloon in the edit features above. you’ll recognize it, it looks like the word balloons in the comics.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
*Sometimes people put more than one idea in a statement, whether it be a phrase, a sentence, a paragraph or an essay.
  1. Look for each idea and make sure it lines up with the “gestalt” (i.e. overall idea) of the statement. If it doesn’t, say so.
    *and this…
    1. Also look for underlying ideas (i.e. assumptions) which you need to bring to the surface so that you can engage them. The assumptions may be right or wrong, but when they remain hidden, they can change the meaning of the overall statement.
I hope that helps.

Sincerely,

De Maria*
That’s awesome, but I meant how to do it like I’m trying to do with your response above. Make sense?

I see, too many endquotes.

Try again. That didn’t look as though it quite worked?
  1. Take the slash ‘/’ out of the first quote command which is in front of the series of words you want to quote. Place the endquote command, the same way you tried above, in the end of the series of words. Like so:
words you want to quote

Just exchange the <> for the ].

Or
2.Highlight the words you want to be in the quote, then click on the word balloon in the edit features above.
Thank you.
you’ll recognize it, it looks like the word balloons in the comics.
Am I getting it?
Sincerely,

De Maria
Thank you SO much De Maria!
 
to paraphrase, the Jews asked Jesus, “which work of God empowers us to perform works for God?”
kjv “Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?”
Empowers is out of place in the paraphrase.
And Jesus said, “believing in me empowers you to perform work for God.”
kjv"Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent."

empowers could be applied but i think is a stretch in Jesus answer. my opinion.

I think they just wanted to know which work was the most important work so that they may please God and get to Heaven.

I’m trying to figure out here. Is this thread about which came first " the chicken or the egg “” aka " faith or works"

Good works( acceptable works) only comes from faith.

Jesus is trying to explain and define.

They where not going to accept him as mesiah. I think reading to the end of the chapter is a much to understand the fullness of the conversation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top