Sola Scriptura - is it rational and historical?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GandalfTheWhite
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Afterburned6387:
The Gospel is simple, all Protestants are in unity when it comes to what it takes to be “saved”,
Click to expand...
Saying so does not make it so. Please set out all the Protestant doctrines of salvation.
40.png
Afterburned6387:
The denomination system I would say promotes greater unity than the Catholic system, where differences are swept up under the rug, and a mere facade of unity is put in its place.
Click to expand...
Wishful thinking. I note that no evidence is put forward. I guess we don’t have to believe this then. What exactly do you believe is not unified in the Catholic Church?

:coffeeread:
 
Actually, if I may, I have few more questions.

If the Bible was given to us so that we know all we need to know, why doesn’t the Bible say that we should follow such a doctrine? If Sola Scriptura is such an important truth (so important that the whole understanding of the Truth rests on it) Bible should surely mention it. However this applies to other very important things. If Sola Scriptura is true and we do not need any external authority, why doesn’t the Bible give us a list of all inspired texts that should be included in the Bible? Once again how are we to know the Truth about God and thus be saved? According to you through the Bible. So isn’t knowing what should be included in the Bible ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS THERE IS TO KNOW?
 
One another thread someone has claimed that SS also includes teaching from the Bible. So SS actually includes some – but not all – traditions. Guess which Tradition SS does not include?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top