Some Assistance With A Skeptic Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter v1gilbert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

v1gilbert

Guest
My cousin is in dialogue with his friend who has fallen away from faith in Jesus. The friend is a big fan of citing the Jesus Seminar as something that has reassured him of his already pre-existing doubts in the veracity of the Bible.

If it would be okay I would like to copy the email and ask for advice in a response. Many Thanks.

*First of all, the idea that all of the words attributed to Jesus in the new testament were not literally and factually things that he said is not an idea that I remember borrowing from anyone, or at least not anyone in particular, and definately not the Jesus Seminar. Before I had ever heard of the Jesus Seminar or marcus borg, i was thinking that it seems obvious how in many parts of the new testament where Jesus is speaking there is a slim chance that his factual words have been preserved for us. For example, when he prays in the garden by himself before his capture, how could his exact words (or even similar words) could have been recorded? since there was nobody else there to hear them? Or the story of him being tempted by the devil to throw himself down from a cliff or whatever. Again…nobody else there to record his words. Those (and a few other) examples are clearly cases of the authors, or the community of followers, inventing a story of his words to match whatever image of him they had developed. And in the cases where there were other people around to hear him speak, it is quite probably that none of those words were written down until about 30 yrs after he was crucified. 30 years is plenty of time for oral traditions to develop a few exaggerations or errors. I definately can’t remember anything accurately that was said or done 30 years ago…especially if there is an evolving community of faith-based people (we know how ridiculous these can get - radical islamists…branch davidians…etc) who are fine-tuning and altering my own memories of what was said or happened.

So when I DID read something from Marcus Borg, his thoughts on the development of christianity were very much in harmony with what I had been thinking for a long time. But I agree, I should do some more research on what he, and the other seminar people are all about…find out their motives, etc. Since borg is a big influence on my spiritual views, I really need to do that.

Oh, but there’s one important error in your interpretation of my interpretation of the early development of christianity. believe it was JESUS whose agenda was primarily (and possibly entirely) sociopolitical change. But once that sociopolitical change didnt occur, the message and purpose of Jesus gradually shifted into one of personal salvation in the afterlife, rather than social salvation in this life. I will admit that the part of history about Jesus disciples and followers risking and sacrificing their own lives for christianity is hard for me to figure out. But I guess many people over the years have done the same thing to effect sociopolitical change…and possibily thats what they were still working for in those early years of the movement.*
 
Your sceptic is right in thinking that Gospels are not straightforwardly historical. They were written in order to preserve and inspire faith in Jesus by showing us not only what He did, but Who He is. This fact, however, should not inspire doubt as to the veracity of the evangelists, since the witnesses to Our Lord and His deeds (the apostles and their successors) guarantee the truths imparted by the Gospels.

Of course, a real sceptic wouldn’t necessarily accept that argument, but it seems a good place to start in removing his doubts. . .

About the Jesus Seminar and the quest for the historical Jesus, perhaps your cousin’s friend could get some good out of Luke Timothy Johnson’s The Real Jesus
 
Where in sacred scripture does your friend find anything where Christ states his mission is to affect socio-political change? It’s not a very well developed argument. I would have him cite scripture or some other historical source written in that time to support his position. Josephus was not of that opinion.

Second, sacred scripture has never been intended to be a history book. Consider what John wrote at the end of his gospel:

But there are also many other things which Jesus did; were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. - John 21:25

One could argue that Jesus told John what he prayed in the garden, or God could have inspired the Gospel writers at a later date. We simply don’t know, and neither can the skeptic prove his case.

Finally, consider these words from the forward of Pope Benedict’s book, Jesus of Nazareth:

“But what can faith in Jesus as the Christ possibly mean, in Jesus as the Son of the Living God, if the man Jesus was so completely different from the picture that the Evangelists painted of him and that the Church, on evidence of the Gospels, takes as the basis of her preaching?”

How can your friend hope to discover the “real” Jesus if he is unwilling to accept the word of those who knew him best?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top