T
toaslan
Guest
Promethius, take a breath. You are not noticing distinctions.One doesn’t have to become the source of something to share in its nature… We don’t need to make such hard and fast distinctions as saying “we are not Divine”, we only need to say that we are not the source of it, and like iron we need the constant presence of fire to maintain the quality of fire. That’s all anyone is saying, and **that IS Divinity **(and the Fathers, and the Councils, and the Catechisms, and the Doctors all agree on this).
Again, saying that we are not at all Divine by Grace is ultimately reductionist, because it removes the import and meaning from “participation”. The very notion of participation includes a distinction between the participator and the participated, so no further emphasis is needed. By stressing that we do not really have Divinity, you run the risk of denying that Grace literally makes us deiform.
… Again, the very notion of participation includes both real distinction, and real sharing of nature.
I encourage you to not draw such a hard and fast linguistic distinction that is quite simply not present in any of the official teachings of the Church.