Wow, you were so sarcastic it hurt my feelings.
In any case, your stones didn’t skip across the lake because it held no water. I like the way you cry for the Mods and then call me names. Classic.
First of all, I didn’t cry to the Mods. I simply informed them that I had tried to engage you in PM mode and you didn’t want to. However, as you were the one who called me “holier-than-thou” and self-righteous and accused me of being a fence sitter and other names I’m not about to just walk away so I will have to engage you here. I’m not much on that whole “turn the other cheek” stuff.
You will note that I waited until you provided reasonable circumstantial evidence of a character trait before labeling you in any way. It is a well understood quirk of zealots that they lack the divergence of thought to appreciate sarcasm.
There are many ways to display signs of anger.
Agreed
One way is to have a pre-determined mind and proving your opponent wrong whilst subconsciously harbouring righteous sentiments.
Where I agree that that might lead someone to display anger I’m not sure that in itself it is a display of anger. It actually reads more like a layman’s definition of the art of the argument - except for the predetermined part of course.
Are you an American? 'Cause America isn’t exactly a secular government.
No I am not an American (
sarcasm alert), an American would most likely have assumed Singapore was in Hawaii (
/sarcasm alert).
But honestly, i am not interested in your politically correct response.
??? Since when is observation politically correct? It is an observed fact, that in my very secular and multi-cultural country the hajib and the turban and even those little knives the Sikhs wear (Kirpans) are seen often in public places (where appropriate). Along with stars of david, crucifixes etc… It is an observed fact that in my highly secular country such displays are not for one moment seen by our authorities as cautionary, for any other reason other than appropriateness (turbans around heavy machinery, Kirpans when boarding an airplane etc.). It is an observed fact that my government funded public radio and television have many articles and features celebrating the many varied traditions of all of these faiths and cultures, Islam included. So, far from being politically correct I am merely being observant. And once again you have insulted me unjustly.
You know, i am not some info-on-demand-library.
However, you are willing to make the previously posted far-reaching generalizations about a peoples and a faith (and indeed individuals) without providing a shred of evidence to back them up.
Do your own research if you disbelieve and then you can put pieces of the puzzle together. It doesn’t take a brainiac to realize this
I did. On each one of these previously referenced assertions and found precious little factual information to back them up
Your initial insinuation was good enough.
My guess is, you may have changed your mind upon reading his claims more carefully after your reply to me. Anyone can come up with statistics and false claims. It only takes one naive person to believe in it and then it will spread like wildfire.
Once again you pursue the strawman. When did I ever say I agreed with Dr. Naif or didn’t agree with him… ever. You were, in fact, the one to bring up Dr. Naif, I merely pointed out that in my brief Google search I noted that where he made claims he provide facts and statistics to back them up. Something you hadn’t done.
I can make similar claims from anyone too. How about jihadwatch or islam-watch? Are you then going to believe claims from such sites and its authors?
Again relevance? I have never said I believe any claims from Dr. Naif.
I thought you were done with your games, but apparently, you want to be the winner - so there. This will be my last post to you. You can continue arguing with the wind.
Ah! tilting at windmills… one of my favorite pasttimes.
